From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17782: 24.3; package.el: searches don't see elided chars of package name Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:14:31 +0200 Message-ID: <878spv1afs.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87zjhfi4xl.fsf@naesten.mooo.com> <87d0f82zle.fsf@gnus.org> <877e5gs8pr.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="198320"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Samuel Bronson , 17782@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 08 18:15:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHs8m-000pQ9-4I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:15:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58212 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHs8k-00019M-Lp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:15:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39685) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHs8e-000192-0F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHs8c-0006ji-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHs8c-0006jR-Pz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHs8c-0006Nr-K4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17782 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 17782-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17782.157055127824490 (code B ref 17782); Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17782) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2019 16:14:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHs8D-0006Mv-J4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:14:37 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:39114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHs8B-0006Ml-Ow for 17782@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:14:36 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHs87-0007CI-Nw; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:14:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877e5gs8pr.fsf@tcd.ie> (Basil L. Contovounesios's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2019 19:37:20 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168662 Archived-At: "Basil L. Contovounesios" writes: > I'm curious to know why the ellipsis is added as a display property in > truncate-string-to-width[1] instead of making the relevant text > invisible[2]. Isn't this behaviour too specific to this use case to > justify extending truncate-string-to-width with it? Sorry, I don't quite understand? Making the text invisible would make it look visually different than what it used to look like, so the ellipsis have to be added to avoid changing the look. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no