From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38156: 27.0.50; [PATCH] VC: ability to skip update buffers prompt Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:55:58 +0100 Message-ID: <878sojq9w1.fsf@gnus.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="152363"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38156@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrii Kolomoiets Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 06:57:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iV87z-000dWH-Un for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:57:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53656 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iV87y-0002iF-QT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:57:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iV87r-0002h8-Gk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:57:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iV87q-0002nx-F0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:57:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51871) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iV87q-0002ns-Bb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iV87q-0002Yo-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38156 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 38156-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38156.15737109709753 (code B ref 38156); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38156) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2019 05:56:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60688 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iV86z-0002XF-Oc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:49732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iV86y-0002X2-BS for 38156@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:56:08 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iV86o-0000nz-OP; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:56:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andrii Kolomoiets's message of "Sat, 9 Nov 2019 22:29:28 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171537 Archived-At: Andrii Kolomoiets writes: > The `update' argument of `vc-retrieve-tag' is ignored by git, hg and svn > vc backends so the answer for "Update any affected buffers?" prompt > doesn't matter. This prompt can be omitted. Would it be possible to make those backends respect the UPDATE argument instead? I had a quick peek at vc-cvs-retrieve-tag (which does respect the argument), and it looks a bit painful, and I'm not sure whether it looks that useful. Anybody got an opinion? I applied the patch anyway, because it provides a way to make the backends say whether they support it or not, which seems generally useful. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no