From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41423: Installing the fix for bug#41423 on emacs-27 Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:59:07 +0100 Message-ID: <878s883y8k.fsf@gmx.de> References: <86k116inmr.fsf@sacsa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <86tv0aecgn.fsf@gmail.com> <87r1v4z3f1.fsf_-_@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33302"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?andr=C3=A9s_?= =?UTF-8?Q?ram=C3=ADrez?= , 41423@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 01 11:01:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W1c-0008Z7-Md for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 11:01:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53770 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W1b-0000yn-Mh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:01:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W03-0000yJ-4m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47359) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W02-0001tR-Sl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6W02-0002Dv-QX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41423 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41423-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41423.16121735628469 (code B ref 41423); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 09:59:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58905 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6VzO-0002CW-De for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 04:59:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:55143) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6VzM-0002CB-2P for 41423@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 04:59:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1612173549; bh=dxQ/g7XMQZi5f008GaJE19gFsIYOGgWNiGDmnhI+j3Q=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=iRxPLhqRecp839iBbK0wFa4w6M2T5gS1cAaZDsjOwNK2I62hcFs+WNY7U1o9zNpeV uyrrLI34g1R779utMj8EX66BpeyCmuYAPi8uSMW5TdfoDbtV+JSLCC3NjAGwcvmuGF Vtt1Ugec7OAn5TYY+WgckTWrZgnCDdstr94oeSJs= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([79.140.124.49]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1M8hVB-1l1p9w1aQz-004joh; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 10:59:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:36:09 -0500") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:i4KPqLIZNNKsrg/iZkKIhbck2tQnIj37g/K9dSM6ZlNbL+RbTC3 rx3A3hwugkP9JbuAiZGIK4kmz4IPSRkcLO44AHEW+Tvj+mMLnRcdJ0Sq/S5wM0MJWiJFdEU j6Hh/PFtzYvCoOnuV3S6MoOy6JFVIyp3bx4BviWpRl4HPgmkEResrQUCyRD/isuzSMdu20t UxxmVbRNHso6ytPvicvfQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:mKWRuTUIJM4=:Cr1FXpSoLTiD8Ii87hDT2a VuIKx5QIJ5wo/9LH+KrGia7NeWA7PZSbTcaGNDXn/Cfp0cJ4QP95irDLuFOnwUuavTXmINpmy nFFr78aPqfg/yFox2v6vaISeuutPOvK0V/KA/oKMGQ65EF+CMiUJEwMlRoHEGqaUZkyNDe1J4 gEW+Oz40BDLzRhmpgJRTzuETIDj6x9MtXgkeUhnP2+bjUKHioDNLmPpBrYnIDuw0uvBoyQZ+Y ceqAOuF2A0uxImcevgh20+ttaK3Nm1QziQkqE8f1KIudwrjYiPz5eNiZ7kIMA2pAD4L3RNloq 5FNoC6bSKc0ArkkkHmgCKedlKibyq8GVnjNgkExHu2ozUbSxclD18GR9DeshlivuLewXFf2DK rsRAB4Q1bvEZsp9Tg+WXZYSq/QeUA047tVEiq2aQ5JfDPJ6Qd1U4C2TlqsBzViH8jfOPSfmHP bvT//otHiBPl7zsERUBaPexenzWDZXNveOeIQ+qQRNTt+XyEypcAn4Rbs7yvlLmX2Uu0ZvYfj +ggAbcnNFGqhLBvR2afabsg5GsgbCo+tznF/9o5Yt3zNwm0yqyE1jYngZpKQ5C0VaqYxBmEIj t+BB32yXYaxFo7U5goH3ZlLgFRH3VOOvSWtUlEqwyXK+apjTapVX34cevP3FXfe0dKE060JxQ k1+ZkaFg8wopQntTRi0LR74lXg5T7Th1ToGLk15ljaUwwdcT1D9oz0NSg0Ee0yEPLQgh7wQpa Jn+LG72d4JUEMSuqlGBdwl+FWSTZJmRiTmFFyI84Mfw/vlukcl9YP4zOpLIWInVutSCKemWB X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199069 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: Hi, > IIUC Michael had marked this bug as "blocking" for Emacs-27, so this > argues for installing it on the `emacs-27` branch. > > The patch is not without risks seeing how it changes a function from > returning a list to returning a function and how it fundamentally > changes *when* the code is executed. So I'm not sure whether it should > go on the `emacs-27` branch: > > A- For non-Eshell users it is "obviously safe". > B- For Eshell-over-Tramp users it should be a clear improvement even if > it turns out to introduce some unforeseen regressions in some cases. > C- Finally, Eshell-not-over-Tramp users should hopefully see no > difference at all, which mostly means no improvement to make up for > any risk of regression. > > So, is the improvement in B worth the risk in C? For me, the patch is not trivial enough that I can read it fluently. So I propose to keep the bug open as blocking for Emacs 27, and backport the patch to the emacs-27 branch only after the 27.2 release. Whether there will be an Emacs 27.3 doesn't matter then. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.