From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46621: Copy line Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:13:02 +0100 Message-ID: <878s7hlg2p.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87tuq99ova.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y2fkrypp.fsf@gnus.org> <87ft1qq4b6.fsf@gnus.org> <87o8ge8ugr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28881"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 46621@debbugs.gnu.org, Daniel =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 21 14:14:09 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDoYr-0007Of-AK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:14:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52702 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDoYq-0001iO-C1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 08:14:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDoYk-0001iI-1u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 08:14:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDoYj-0001am-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 08:14:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDoYj-0000Xs-Le for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 08:14:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46621 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46621-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46621.16139131942036 (code B ref 46621); Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:14:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46621) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2021 13:13:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53683 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDoXy-0000Wl-Fw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 08:13:14 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:35432) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDoXw-0000WY-GC for 46621@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 08:13:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=4oRh3vf3kyXvFZ1uLkl/nSAPbwuorBumhHnSlIMk3Rg=; b=c+0z1dNW19AsNfjk8TuWrtnoK5 265sf75NWUzxlvGJsDB/FghnPT5QFYSyVy0IYeGwUQLcSirLA43cnNBVYaIZ8euJ4Ol2W6ofr7yfg wFa41GPvhO8D8s4RU/jkzpXwUejRyVurBZfB9JGbj1b3E+LfdETN5G+7T7dwSDsesiS0=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDoXo-0008Hz-8W; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:13:06 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEXv4c/BtaeJgHdW UUv///8yXQ++AAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UCFQ0GEaNowHsAAAGkSURBVDjLXVOLFcMg CARdAM0Cigsksv9uBVFjw2sT4/HxDgQkWPauzAIXoJgpI3aCYlv6wAKx9atH5tYqCzexVe9sgDTO 7elcxX79ynLxUzQVdw5Xy5wSM+tf/TgXQC7wb+wvZPoA8zvKnedOhUBNhukBMZkHU7jVFfWTrdLK glBj13c7I4pXiY+7vBGEZdcAnBHiuRK8iqVh80MgllVsPGlTCWU40wSS5wlSNIKm/1eIZfhApnEO 1S2xBX7aFYQly/Axf+V+H+G2OwlaLlxAdD5pSTTkmQz/0jsPTw4ZPoYzrGn9UHDEBTribWvL+Q7X 0V6smGmxul4ghUe73eaR0Iu3fp6NVI84glD7gy9j2sSCSBkk0oiqWz0HtlVY/QVvtbWW1hC4DJcK WbFOgKgeco23Z3cyx8XawNgKe2UAvnyS8qDBIi2JNJWuaaiiRUdOnBkZkRC+VnVa3EXnzC+FF692 13CfzP+7M/j3pIR2o+Zs6+CmCaRzNHbxHBIvtUuU0uwI8pxOCgQ2HhkcsI7Q8tKhhUsB624sKDek GT5AB3S8uPwAvKgswflmujsAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDItMjFUMTM6MDY6MTcr MDA6MDAxgsZ6AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTAyLTIxVDEzOjA2OjE3KzAwOjAwQN9+ xgAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Ezra Collective's _Blue Note Re:imagined (1)_: "Footprints" In-Reply-To: <87o8ge8ugr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat, 20 Feb 2021 20:28:20 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200490 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > `duplicate-line' is a better name, but the problem is that is based on the > existing command `copy-from-above-command'. Should they share > the same name prefix? Please decide, I have no opinion on this. :-) I think it's fine to go with `duplicate-line', even if it's conceptually similar to `copy-from-above-command'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no