From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49065: 28.0.50; Major Changes to Gnus Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 13:39:50 -0700 Message-ID: <878s332bqh.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87fsxhwv47.fsf@dick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1115"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 49065@debbugs.gnu.org, dick.r.chiang@gmail.com To: Filipp Gunbin Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 21 22:40:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lvQiI-000071-CE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 22:40:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49816 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lvQiH-0000O2-DY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lvQiB-0000Nt-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lvQiB-0005XM-FY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lvQiA-0003SM-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49065 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 49065-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49065.162430800113275 (code B ref 49065); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49065) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jun 2021 20:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lvQi9-0003S2-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:40618 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lvQi6-0003Ro-P3 for 49065@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 16:40:00 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (75-172-126-110.tukw.qwest.net [75.172.126.110]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 423A7FA7A9; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 20:39:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1624307992; bh=dxRYb9FhKF8Lfr0rX4qZdYF36hPojEkDTgw8nwxE0jo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=m3ntzB6ky/f/DVo9dB0rUGqILM6bgBpYl+7hcCSxa+u8HNU3KbsIac83OqDFcxCwm RYazpTOpp3n2vOiPnbzHzcZrxMsm2TZE5/EtbZVUMTt42KUdh6GyPHwaUe/mu5bbyt Q2wHUW6LSvTQH0ZcxqPj15C6Bs66SaCHlDU/O20I= In-Reply-To: (Filipp Gunbin's message of "Mon, 21 Jun 2021 23:03:24 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208832 Archived-At: Filipp Gunbin writes: > It'd be more helpful to submit this in series of small-to-middle > patches. It's very hard to review a "patch bomb"... +1. You're stuck with the code reviewers you've got, so in the interest of seeing your changes go in, I'd recommend making things easier on us mere mortals. At the very least, separate your doc changes out from your code changes. Sincerely, Someone who would like these changes or something like them to be applied