From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "J.P." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29108: 25.3; ERC SASL support Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:42:19 -0700 Message-ID: <878s0r2c3o.fsf__21959.6262018726$1629812610$gmane$org@neverwas.me> References: <87h8ud92zl.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtprkkgi.fsf@neverwas.me> <87o89oi87g.fsf@neverwas.me> <87zgt8s1jt.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33147"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ulrich Mueller , 29108@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-erc@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 24 15:43:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIWi0-0008Pz-CD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 15:43:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54274 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIWhy-0001rg-7H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIWhj-0001rX-4B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60149) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIWhi-00024F-Gp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIWhi-0001Eu-EK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:43:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "J.P." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29108 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 29108-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29108.16298125534726 (code B ref 29108); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:43:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29108) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2021 13:42:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43462 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIWhE-0001EA-Ro for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:42:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-108-mta99.mxroute.com ([136.175.108.99]:34663) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIWhD-0001Dx-65 for 29108@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from filter004.mxroute.com ([149.28.56.236] filter004.mxroute.com) (Authenticated sender: mN4UYu2MZsgR) by mail-108-mta99.mxroute.com (ZoneMTA) with ESMTPSA id 17b7865cc3100074ba.001 for <29108@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:42:22 +0000 X-Zone-Loop: ae89fe8bc9b661f83b2e4a4d7e67b1d703fd97dc69ab X-Originating-IP: [149.28.56.236] In-Reply-To: <87zgt8s1jt.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:01:10 +0200") X-AuthUser: masked@neverwas.me X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212540 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I think that's up to the Network Security Manager level -- the user can > customise this there. Hi Lars, my apologies. I obviously wasn't being very clear but was telepathically referring to client certs being transmitted in the clear for TLS versions less than 1.3. I'm not sure any `nsm-protocol-check--*' functions screen for this specifically because it's probably/rightly considered less of a security issue and more of a minor personal-hygiene matter. And not that I'm privy to much in core IRC circles, but I suspect the occasional smattering of attention paid to this topic can be chalked up to bored devs just having a say about more exciting things like dissidents and tracking. So for ERC's purposes, I guess there's little sense in warning about what's probably just an iffy corner case in the end. Thanks, and sorry for the distraction.