From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50748: Acknowledgement (28.0.50; tramp-sh.el uses mknod file p which is not available on macos) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:58:20 +0200 Message-ID: <878rznbapf.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87o88jrehq.fsf@workstation.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7687"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 50748@debbugs.gnu.org To: Damien Merenne Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 23 16:59:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mTQBt-0001mh-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:59:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47156 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTQBr-00086R-HS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTQBi-00086G-RM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mTQBi-0000RE-KE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTQBi-0007w9-Jg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50748 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50748-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50748.163240911030444 (code B ref 50748); Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50748) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2021 14:58:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55380 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTQBC-0007ux-54 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:58:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:37211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mTQB9-0007uc-Ee for 50748@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:58:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1632409101; bh=K619I+ApK6J71WEcy1lw7d5CwdtONJ1h/xVoDqJar3E=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gpYv4p615Y7mRUnZXaRqhtM2BF3CIHJDl7iZzNnsun8AuAG6yBaiw8vjVjbYOBTwo Lufv7VeghcUhmeJ8sz2+ceSgnNvyngKYIk9fLKNmfBE90J2mGhpPMfk8tAweeAXysU 9uaGAjJWMvQhDqlq/QkoG2VMTPBLKs3kL63/kSks= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([79.140.112.92]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N9dwd-1mxLAm0LZd-015cFw; Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:58:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Damien Merenne's message of "Thu, 23 Sep 2021 13:50:22 +0000") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:t9W96HwrKEzZzgygTFMRLXceuml3LUM8QDy/lrJYqbZSTkem8bS zQtMaQrHGFEOATv54zzLU+XJqiVcdBqfd368jOls/Sd9DjJ90xRsqMEC+PK35ty8QlBh+iJ YJhqFnmtEdH96qntGmIN5jAE2J/HM/Vf1Su/GFFyjYWV+DP8h13WSQ88ECrL2yfqtCLpVEv BCAtlq238TjU97DoUv8kA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:uvQMFkDbXOU=:ZYelymYx/RhAM65C2/ddYL thPLTwoFGLOocNadOshYET8nzYEkj/ssNjsY+jsmZEZzN6E3jcpo1DjN95Tm2LGB67cy0QBqt qM3sCKf8CmarXVvznzj8fsR4M/1FZBBDz/kfIMdFrAqFyLdsdy0BAb37BV5f4cg4g4lLKiK2g 572yvnosA6XTP5cfk86jva6jC5rhlB/NpHArXU+LdCtAfLR/ZuvdLd5AN68N46nMHjH7QpWek wxohy5lzqNhdX3L7HEbkoCz+81bVPe/b9w/4gdye8NU8asBC43XbFwlAqfX2yCW9Jny4U/Egg wjpakMhFytOfK6gbghakGBe6GGRSSHJIDmIr+fSSTdwkNntYf37wBvmyHlRhczWoRttE/PsMW MhYBce3tjDn+WAn1ZdaA2ZQ5ldmSZ3nxc1AUpn0wBuAvW1wHSn8TMaco/ODX+UsnZ7EMmW0n5 2pxFQv0aBWKmxwZCWebQpho5eVCSH60g18wI9g4fvfZLxKDZZEdTl0usl+ATPXJuug8oBqPPr q67Vdl5w0Rc4xW4LFjX5oFk9xY7bd9xBfatNLPB+8Umfclr6ZrU93tJ9+EcPdCjG/mvUL8KaD 4LL6h4lyJIQw5g3UjGvtVQIqxk4CZyi+MBjFVUz5/0zcA0kKlMQmtY39vBA8X3lmUpeV+pRqm mzHDI/sLlzqnWhOsQGpbB7UZzsZGASobs7hErDcaU73vzZUS+9mPT0Ns43zKj/831Jou+uzVR M/WD5pTloyOK0uoXu9TRycK5K+WWl+ewf7imdgqWHp21dDlRXJc/zrcLgCPeoB4iOVIdw029 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:215190 Archived-At: Damien Merenne writes: Hi Damien, > No idea about the equivalent mknod command. Using strace on Linux > shows that both `mknod p` and `mkfifo` results in the exact same > `mknodat` system call so `mkfifo` could probably be always used ? Nope. There are GNU/Linux systems, which do not offer the mkfifo command. For example, my QNAP NAS (which I misuse as test target). > It's still not working, I don't see any error regarding the mkfifo > now, I attached the tramp debug buffer. I tried creating the fifo > manually on the macos laptop and running the command > > cd /Users/dam/ && exec 2>'/tmp/tramp.EIPAXu' env > INSIDE_EMACS\=28.0.50\,tramp\:2.5.2-pre > PS1\=/ssh\:laptop.lan\:/Users/dam/\ \#\$\ sh -c while\ sleep\ 1\;\ > do\ echo\ \$\(hostname\)\ out\;\ echo\ \$\(hostname\)\ err\ \>\&2\;\ > done > > And there, it's working, I can cat the fifo and see the stderr output. > No idea why tramp seems to stall. Running over tramp there is just no > output in the stdout nor the stderr buffer. Hmm. The provided traces look as they should. Perhaps we're missing accept-process-output calls? Could you, please, add to your test: (while t (accept-process-output) (sit-for 0.1)) Best regards, Michael.