From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51342: 29.0.50; remove non-CAPs from rcirc capability list Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:05:03 +0000 Message-ID: <878ryiwxf4.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87o87gzjpd.fsf@neverwas.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22966"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51342@debbugs.gnu.org To: "J.P." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 24 12:06:22 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1meaOT-0005ju-7u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 12:06:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35676 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meaOS-00006k-6p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:06:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meaOA-0008VG-Gh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meaOA-0001Rk-3g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meaO9-0007Ml-S8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:06:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87o87gzjpd.fsf@neverwas.me> Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51342 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.163506992428273 (code B ref -1); Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Oct 2021 10:05:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meaNX-0007Lx-MH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:05:23 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38908) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1meaNT-0007Ln-9w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:05:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meaNO-0008JC-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:05:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:38291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1meaNJ-0000lZ-8j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 06:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A360D240105 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 12:05:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1635069905; bh=WqqlFQShTNcnsuzXZ8Yk+2zJD7xcal+OK8Rgm1W91dw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=NJU6syZ5AVFIaklNDZxXv8r/bM5p9Ql/PSGjEKrIARH7QMLVyjvl6sssU6lzK/I82 agcE9PfNtb17n2Ru8CeLkui7ApaWDWJTtQhh3jk0IMH5SRUrS8SiFmmBnjjL1SRfzY maz4C5XPBwFcYjE5QAb782z8UUoM1EGsaKzxEEst5Uw7ULpDfYuTyzi6kggEYTM1kr zXeT1NTB/eQZLh7k0MLqSvaGPttewNhBK1Uc5OKbCUWoidMbnPlHhmUUyR/fnBZmGn y1NCva3C42He16vfMJE4sXk4u4ozEzi4UCDcrKLGW+URqpxxJAS9d8jwU0MV6sedcr q5yGJw1FaaZOg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4HcYc04j9rz9rxD; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 12:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6Nc Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:218088 Archived-At: "J.P." writes: > Severity: minor > > Hi Philip, > > Nice job on the v3 stuff. I happened across a couple capabilities being > requested that don't officially exist, a distinction you've probably > picked up on in the course of pursuing this work [1]. The couple that > slipped by are always NAK'd but basically harmless, so you may just want > to leave 'em or otherwise go your own way. If so, please ignore this. I have to be honest, I was not familiar with this distinction. As you say, I assuming that anything that wasn't implemented by a server would be NAK'd. What confuses me is how standard-replies doesn't have to be requested. message-ids is clear, because they rely on message-tags and if a that is provided, sending message IDs even if they were not requested wouldn't pose any issues. The thing is that standard-replies introduces new types, that the client must be able to parse. Just sending them to any non IRCv3-capable client would presumable confuse it. From reading the spec, I don't immediately see that it says the capability should be requested. Could you explain this? -- Philip Kaludercic