From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53853: [PATCH] Don't use string-replace in flymake Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 17:02:31 +0100 Message-ID: <878rul5otk.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r18e7fb7.fsf@gmail.com> <87zgn1ublj.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtj17oqg.fsf@gmail.com> <87ee4d7o3f.fsf@gmail.com> <875ypp7kmu.fsf@gmail.com> <83iltpwlwn.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsotwjiw.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7995rd6.fsf@gmail.com> <87czjx5pip.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26738"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Brian Leung , Lars Ingebrigtsen , 53853@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 08 18:59:49 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nHUmL-0006oj-JL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 18:59:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHUmK-0006XS-Ey for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 12:59:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHSxL-00040v-2A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 11:03:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nHSxK-000754-OV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 11:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHSxK-0001oE-HK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 11:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 16:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53853 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 53853-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53853.16443361686930 (code B ref 53853); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 16:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53853) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2022 16:02:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHSwy-0001nb-KI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 11:02:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com ([209.85.221.48]:43795) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nHSwx-0001kw-Fs for 53853@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 11:02:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id i14so1974494wrc.10 for <53853@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:02:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TOuzsG7yQ/NOvZj8ln7/5Ec17ndpxhcoMRdHc5lTVbQ=; b=DvvhkXB+TrsXThWOh5Mg8DcBu5tsHYGlCNNvI5EM9ZM/Q2euQSSsUsYHX5hwRbzC2F n+Gg631zMwkLOtZEymZ/IauizpdoH3C5l9aqwguNUpcDwfK8VvnwvKkDd9g/XyoXi3GT w4mq9McbI3M8FTgtbO3dxq9wXeeCu1lLpZHUQfXC9ovzDLVls6GXuBAJhkbC+Wj9xMwl UlAroHMoNF2OTEQAUX14ZlgQJ74uvbrz1LxGvIXZJg0IScjFWepdbH7aeGHjv25RUdaG iCeKuoZBdB3h8JESOvRryrK5Ecx79i/HEOd/r/iyyHpTCB8nruP3RRhZ28UY8+yBWuxF aP7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TOuzsG7yQ/NOvZj8ln7/5Ec17ndpxhcoMRdHc5lTVbQ=; b=J0BQSx1w3kUeSY+wn78jDxpEUJpTQEpVUbbWs1p24jV4BeTd5pdvohVxkbxzxZGOki +L3GT7ybhMFOARnTX6q0GBNZvLBySzkc/YQK60y7u5dPwpMrYoa970KFjPqAelKKKAeQ BS1a0k5IyGTpPqp9RHKgs+DfaTpAIxcdnre0K+GQ/nC/71PkToMm7TFteO+p1mXFy70q 6sYkzyE3+cVTTagljngoSHZTZMAtN1TQL1xTqpZ4+t1DkEb49Bg+w1lMQBvsXKHxueVR wp93a7ct/mKk9HUbBOQ2cCvzFxAN2ejXiHE2VeiVbz2b40+PT3ujV4FoLFsgmgRTP4kG cDYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oYrmKcK6vM1BkB6MiV/W+yVII1oJcvHTNKaCFQuMHcXG60u6S NdJGhHFfoziRtshtD/zdFVCR7Vog7SxVyQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7xPwo7myjGcmTMJRJM7oFbbDHvUtyBy1gzvVAtDwf/MisO0u3T0e0lmyJvVwYC2YsgasVOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:560c:: with SMTP id l12mr4167884wrv.647.1644336153283; Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:02:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:a7fc:d931:6725:24e8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j15sm3264950wmq.19.2022.02.08.08.02.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 08 Feb 2022 08:02:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: ("=?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?="'s message of "Tue, 8 Feb 2022 15:51:59 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:226393 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 15:51:59 +0000, Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora said: Jo=C3=A3o> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:47 PM Robert Pluim wrote: Jo=C3=A3o> I think so. We're in that phase of the release cycle where >> everything in Jo=C3=A3o> emacs-28 that Jo=C3=A3o> fixes a bug ends up in main, right? If so I would say yes. = But >> let Eli or Jo=C3=A3o> Lars confirm. >>=20 >> Everything that gets committed to the release branch always gets >> merged to master, unless it=CA=BCs marked 'do not merge'. Jo=C3=A3o> Right that's what I meant by "ends up in main" ("main" the n= ew name of the Jo=C3=A3o> former "master" branch, which is still accessible by that na= me AFAIK). In GNU Elpa maybe. In emacs the branch is called 'master'. >> The phase of the >> release cycle we=CA=BCre in is: doc fixes and regressions only (unle= ss we >> manage to bribe Lars/Eli somehow :-) ) Jo=C3=A3o> Right. And isn't this a regression? Something that used to= work in Emacs Jo=C3=A3o> 27.1 Jo=C3=A3o> and doesn't in the upcoming Emacs 28.1? Jo=C3=A3o> Anyway, committing to master/main is probably fine too, beca= use that's what Jo=C3=A3o> governs the "emission" of an ELPA package, as far as I know. Yes, but the emacs-28 -> master merge happens pretty regularly as well. I=CA=BCm assuming there=CA=BCs some magic that then makes GNU Elpa ta= ke notice. Robert --=20