From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57072: [BUG] update-glyphless-char-display and variation selectors Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:05:12 +0200 Message-ID: <878rnoaa13.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83edxpvec4.fsf@gnu.org> <83leruq3p3.fsf@gnu.org> <83a68apxbm.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmh6nh2f.fsf@gnu.org> <83h72indie.fsf@gnu.org> <83edxloiu3.fsf@gnu.org> <83a689ochp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3237"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 57072@debbugs.gnu.org, Axel Svensson To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 16 10:07:47 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oNrc3-0000gH-Ou for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 10:07:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56406 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oNrc2-0004QR-OQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:07:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46704) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oNraO-0004Nk-2t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:06:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oNraM-0000mR-NN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oNraM-00073X-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57072 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57072-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57072.166063712327076 (code B ref 57072); Tue, 16 Aug 2022 08:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57072) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2022 08:05:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44689 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oNrZj-00072d-0S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:05:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:41691) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oNrZg-00072P-CD for 57072@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 04:05:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id p10so11649232wru.8 for <57072@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 01:05:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc; bh=IAAk6V6jMqSwqTpcl76np37TnqTju/kEUqj1QACZHEk=; b=R/vIf7FiP7WzmnyR0vEZZa1JGZySCMm3OrlDTXPy5wfOABt1zUbjs+bdYzMD9qnGjn MKA9AFuDnrxWY/s8u75qzxOQ2AvhMFluhW0Nqdx97VoMADJDaoK1u0Dusrlw2Q322Eh0 0RFoquh6uGFRlJlrxGR2L9cEYZPa3OOjffPn82UBgXrzf+efrtpsUoj6/SbXwQevFgZS dKvNL26FUrbUbjcAa7/RI4D8LqFkyP2opPjGY/SPQGCFzxcKfk0K3b6vchZ3V6tnDvU6 Ho8OcslRvgcU5LTAirFeseqJLKvUqir6v7HIvwj9nzZDPjUVtFdPrlHnZT4+vDhTy6Ve CgKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=IAAk6V6jMqSwqTpcl76np37TnqTju/kEUqj1QACZHEk=; b=oMr8zGPWgnYYh0Yoyge+3I3UeMeStoM25u+y2O9/zUoKwz58ClG/GF/tELM5T8piZW s6USMbwflVn5ZEdldupEgEwfjZWXFw5cKyRyBnNCglYVBLjQiV6V3p3oPbB2SxLqpneM w/XThS/QgmT0HFIqvCv8xa9G2d560QUFP9laVni1XBj6UuhTrUUxeKCiR6I3ncwO2KSE vU1WCM77uIE727Srxlk8f/lrDOGfnECuqNxflBYkOYID1T/Ko0kFt4YxlbJ+lKFUQz9g UrfqsbREpOiH1yeWjDqQVOvJS2yclTOTfJnZu5cClv9z+6i7enK/CbarMCjVLYrxNi+s M/eA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3xLef7gHtqobDgGCntS29fK9OvHi8AX8LNUsUpVI4fK+7zWQLu fLUQz2c9mRKdeeWa0LwI3Q5Do5ECk4w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6pnwd6M2D4gzy+M30D2cd7ymhSLTBOVTbnvHHOjyS2cEjxw7RxFaLsqw5iOwW1yqVu07elTw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fb84:0:b0:21a:10f2:1661 with SMTP id a4-20020adffb84000000b0021a10f21661mr10670298wrr.2.1660637113593; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 01:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:dd88:29c3:8b09:8f16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i16-20020a05600c355000b003a5ee64cc98sm7526898wmq.33.2022.08.16.01.05.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 16 Aug 2022 01:05:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83a689ochp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:46:58 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:239875 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:46:58 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Axel Svensson >> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 13:51:21 +0200 >> Cc: 57072@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> > Why do you think including VS1 through VS14 is a mistake? >> It appears like blocks.awk somehow designates VS1 through VS14 for >> emoji use, while the Unicode standard per [1] and [5] above seem to >> exclude them from emoji use. I am not sure whether VS1 through VS14, or >> VS17 through VS256 need to be designated to some other script by >> blocks.awk. Eli> So you are saying that we should exclude VS1 through VS14 from the Eli> Emoji script? Eli> Robert, do you remember why we included them in the script? Hmm. Ignorance on my part seems the most likely explanation. VS1-14 are not used for emoji/text presentation selection, so we should probably just fix blocks.awk Eli> As for VS17 and above, I'm not sure we should assign them to any Eli> script. Perhaps to Han? What problems are caused by them not having a script? The composition rules for them with Han codepoints work now, no? Robert --