unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 57502@debbugs.gnu.org, arstoffel@gmail.com
Subject: bug#57502: 29.0.50; Issue with `or' clause of buffer-match-p
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:19:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878rn0k8mc.fsf@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <835yi4ogqt.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 03 Sep 2022 14:10:50 +0300")

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Cc: 57502@debbugs.gnu.org
>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>> Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:04:20 +0000
>> 
>> Are there any objections against applying this change?  From what I see
>> pcase is used elsewhere in seq, so it should be possible to recognise
>> and expand the macro, right?
>
> I think we should avoid using pcase in subr.el, since subr.el is
> loaded by loadup.el before pcase.  But I see that this ship has sailed
> already, sigh.

There is no insistence from my end to use pcase, especially because at
first I assumed it ought not to be used in subr.el.  But from what I see
there have been instances of the macro (in `called-interactively-p') for
almost ten years now.  So unless there is a plan to revert this trend,
I'd use pcase to avoid simple issues like the one that caused this bug.





  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-03 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-31 12:02 bug#57502: 29.0.50; Issue with `or' clause of buffer-match-p Augusto Stoffel
2022-08-31 12:47 ` Philip Kaludercic
2022-08-31 12:50   ` Philip Kaludercic
2022-08-31 16:22     ` Augusto Stoffel
2022-08-31 16:30       ` Philip Kaludercic
2022-09-03 11:04     ` Philip Kaludercic
2022-09-03 11:10       ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-09-03 11:19         ` Philip Kaludercic [this message]
2022-09-03 11:54           ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-09-03 12:56             ` Philip Kaludercic

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878rn0k8mc.fsf@posteo.net \
    --to=philipk@posteo.net \
    --cc=57502@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=arstoffel@gmail.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).