From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "J.P." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.erc.general Subject: bug#57956: 29.0.50; Add minimal authorization support to sasl-scram-rfc Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 18:22:24 -0700 Message-ID: <878rm49ttb.fsf@neverwas.me> References: <871qs62o0y.fsf@neverwas.me> <87tu52awv9.fsf@gnus.org> <87a66ssw7s.fsf@neverwas.me> <871qs4mv7a.fsf@posteo.net> <875yhggc5s.fsf@neverwas.me> <875yheus8g.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20117"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 57956@debbugs.gnu.org, Magnus Henoch , emacs-erc@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 28 03:23:14 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1odLn7-00052z-22 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 03:23:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51962 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odLn6-0008M9-3e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35404) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odLmw-0008IC-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1odLmw-0004Kn-EG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odLmw-000793-7s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "J.P." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 01:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57956 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 57956-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57956.166432816327416 (code B ref 57956); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 01:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57956) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Sep 2022 01:22:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odLmc-000787-KD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:22:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-108-mta41.mxroute.com ([136.175.108.41]:46657) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1odLmZ-00077u-MP for 57956@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:22:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-111-mta2.mxroute.com ([136.175.111.2] filter006.mxroute.com) (Authenticated sender: mN4UYu2MZsgR) by mail-108-mta41.mxroute.com (ZoneMTA) with ESMTPSA id 18381b024c30002b7a.001 for <57956@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 01:22:28 +0000 X-Zone-Loop: dc9aa27ec14aa1a550860e8a624a953f3114413f6721 X-Originating-IP: [136.175.111.2] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neverwas.me ; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=izHdMhSw0SX3VS/3w8ZeHOGjxbc8wHSoWvqR3NtW+Js=; b=GJLvh2FOennc8N0ljawVy1b1PM Sg/YJUYnexKRM0S3goj7WNefZPfsPvTraEnwOijcLySnGsZbpTgC2wbSIBea67P+4thx55zX7MXRz kcQXkTFiCQPUL+4tcAyl6jWBgppb8HryvqiTST5Fo7K4beUpOhV1YdhxjCC7Ed7XfKCf0hKAfSU9H FsEXptDehWAjaABdGnlSRKxU55m7mRn3zhOHc9zts6Bm8wQ850RJ8eegTZoHa4adwuR76LPA9hR16 rluCb3CmbWL3C6+X47YTYjZcuXjbaP3iTel05j2dzDJLQO64sunp8itVPhATloM5BR3ZvSqQz30F2 FDpYB/Ag==; In-Reply-To: <875yheus8g.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2022 13:37:19 +0000") X-Authenticated-Id: masked@neverwas.me X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243775 gmane.emacs.erc.general:1922 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > "J.P." writes: > >> Alternatively, we could >> >> - have ERC restrict this feature to users of Emacs 29+, or >> - stick with the status quo and manage this particular case manually via >> erc-comapt.el [1]. >> >> I'd be fine with any of the above, really. > > Do you think there is any interest in providing these functions outside > of ERC? If so, I think adding the code to Compat ought to be fine. Thanks, that's very generous, but somehow I doubt there'd be much general interest (though I'd like to be wrong here). For now, I guess we can just keep them in erc-compat until 29.1 is cut and maybe circle back in the lead-up to 29.2, if that's agreeable to everyone.