From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3021: 23.0.92; MEM FULL on Windows after some VC operations Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:07:46 +0200 Message-ID: <877i1f1431.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> References: <87d4bcqtwo.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> <83ws9kjn8r.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Reiner Steib , 3021@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1240259056 31761 80.91.229.12 (20 Apr 2009 20:24:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 3021@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 20 22:25:35 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lw03Y-0007LQ-Lv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:25:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lw029-0006yV-Gt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:24:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lw025-0006xr-1w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:24:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lw020-0006wx-7d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:24:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58758 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lw020-0006wi-3w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:23:56 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:59437) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lw01z-0006Qr-F4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:23:55 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3KKNqe7021795; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:23:53 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n3KKF2eH019242; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:15:02 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Reiner Steib Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 3021 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 3021-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B3021.124025807717799 (code B ref 3021); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3021) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 20 Apr 2009 20:07:57 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de (mail.uni-ulm.de [134.60.1.11]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n3KK7qQa017790 for <3021@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:07:54 -0700 Original-Received: from bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.175]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n3KK7ouu023537; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:07:50 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bridgekeeper.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CAF13763; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:07:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Face: 3Phac&+dw=IZHjhua]bp}LH<*p{qzj8u+ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:27371 Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Unless I'm missing something, looks like something might be wrong with > how we discover available memory on Windows: how come a process with a > 400MB memory footprint says MEM FULL on a 3GB machine? Ideas anyone? Can I help with more information? > FWIW, I had a couple of days ago a similar incident: a 380MB Emacs > process running on a 1.5GB machine claimed to have passed 75% of > available memory. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/