From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8480: 24.0.50; (elisp) Reading File Names Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 15:58:59 -0400 Message-ID: <877h9appfg.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306612813 18234 80.91.229.12 (28 May 2011 20:00:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 20:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8480@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 28 22:00:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQPg9-0000RF-5M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 22:00:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53417 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQPg8-00087X-HF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 16:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38395) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQPg5-00085M-BQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 16:00:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQPg3-0006cP-Kd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 16:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QQPg3-0006c5-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 16:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQPg2-0005MX-RH; Sat, 28 May 2011 16:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 20:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8480 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8480-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8480.130661275420527 (code B ref 8480); Sat, 28 May 2011 20:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8480) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2011 19:59:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQPfF-0005L2-Gn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 15:59:13 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QQPf7-0005KR-Oh for 8480@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 15:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (c-71-192-165-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [71.192.165.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4SJwxQE030165 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 May 2011 15:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4CA8116031F; Sat, 28 May 2011 15:58:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:42:56 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 16:00:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46764 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > Doc for `read-file-name': Just after describing the PREDICATE arg, we > say that `read-file-name' does not automatically expand file names > etc. > > Then we say "Here is an example:" and give an overall example of using > `read-file-name'. This is not an example to show that `r-f-n' does not > automatically expand file names. In fact, this example might be misread > as trying to show the opposite, since the result returned is an absolute > file name. OK, clarified.