From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11746: feature request: `isearch-query-replace' should open invisible text Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:54:20 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <877gmaf1pd.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87mx3z9od7.fsf@web.de> <87pq02btxv.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87y5eq4pm1.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360915239 28164 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2013 08:00:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:00:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11746@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 15 09:01:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U6GE8-0001fJ-Dr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:01:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33232 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6GDo-0000YN-Oo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:00:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47021) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6GDc-0000Xv-Vv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:00:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6GDW-0007Ze-TG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:00:28 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51566) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U6GDW-0007ZR-QX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:00:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6GEA-0006Xo-4t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11746 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11746-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11746.136091522025065 (code B ref 11746); Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11746) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2013 08:00:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6GDU-0006WE-Jn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:00:20 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:34388 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U6GDT-0006W5-1S for 11746@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 03:00:19 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B3D201B6C801; Thu, 14 Feb 2013 23:59:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87y5eq4pm1.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:17:26 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71298 Archived-At: > I have a question about your patch: I can't find the definition of > `isearch-filter-predicates' you use - I find `isearch-filter-predicate' > however. Is this a typo, or did I miss something? Sorry, that was from an uncommitted patch from bug#11378 where I couldn't decide what is the best way to handle both the variable `search-invisible' and the invisibility isearch filter simultaneously. I'll summarize the current state in bug#11378.