From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: handa@gnu.org (K. Handa) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18610: 24.4.50; Specific file causing emacs to segfault upon opening Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:34:08 +0900 Message-ID: <877g0ct5xb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eguqbk5m.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412685322 24100 80.91.229.3 (7 Oct 2014 12:35:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, maden.ldm@gmail.com, 18610@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 07 14:35:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTyu-0002wY-6g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 14:35:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58467 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTyt-0006hU-Od for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTyp-0006hI-RJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTyo-0006TN-Rr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTyo-0006S8-Og for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTyo-00009B-51 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: handa@gnu.org (K. Handa) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18610 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18610-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18610.1412685261508 (code B ref 18610); Tue, 07 Oct 2014 12:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18610) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2014 12:34:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36244 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTy8-000087-6A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:34:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:38288) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTy5-00007z-RY for 18610@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:34:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fl1-122-134-99-48.iba.mesh.ad.jp ([122.134.99.48]:55896 helo=shatin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTy4-0004Wr-Gw; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 08:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: from handa by shatin with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1XbTxw-0000J6-Ru; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:34:08 +0900 In-Reply-To: <83egulmdhz.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:20:08 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:94224 Archived-At: In article <83egulmdhz.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > Yes, but what's the reason for having latin-extra-code-table in the > first place? I vaguely remember that it was a request from latin-1 users who occasionally have to edit files created by Windows users, and those files tend to contain those non-Laint-1 characters. > > > Btw, it would be nice if these masks could be documented so that their > > > meaning was clear. I considered the possibility that the flags are > > > not set correctly, but couldn't test that hypothesis given my > > > insufficient knowledge of ISO-2022 details and variants. > > > > Sorry for the poor comments in my code. I'll work on it soon. > TIA. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TiA ? :-p > OK. Do you think this fix is safe enough to go to the release branch, > so as to prevent Emacs 24.4 from crashing in these circumstances? There may be more places where the similar change should be applied, but, I think, at least that patch is safe enough. --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org