From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Matthias Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21934: 24.5; find-tag: reading TAGS file incorrectly Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 20:38:49 +0100 Message-ID: <877flgl8l2.fsf@winky.hogwarts> References: <87ziyd20cb.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <564AA697.9000203@yandex.ru> <87poz8lexa.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <564B62B7.4030509@yandex.ru> <87bnasle2g.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <564B67E7.7030405@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447789228 12011 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2015 19:40:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21934@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 20:40:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zym6x-0007DY-FG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 20:40:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60413 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zym6w-0004mF-Js for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:40:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51097) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zym6o-0004ih-8t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:40:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zym6l-0002yE-3p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:40:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zym6k-0002y7-Vi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zym6k-0002tr-Gr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Matthias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21934 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21934-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21934.144778915011013 (code B ref 21934); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21934) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2015 19:39:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42031 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zym5u-0002rW-6i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:39:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:33650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Zym5a-0002qG-Ll for 21934@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so245049481wme.0 for <21934@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:38:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=lR+x6L0hVAHw63W3BmBMdEvurHpQlMiLH8xfwBafmSU=; b=QfNv7TfwvVoXpp4CumiCFgWs1PhYgqx7TXC3HJW6ToTYY3LLXENVctUla54VrfHhff +Mzuds9nC1hrKn+iwjPCm3FIFhpJoQ/KqDqxkNqkewyk+oj9BUcKgJ98tcSw+OFsqch7 zNzFP2hJzVIkEfQHN4qTrpbylM+2KgByr6ESdO22dRmrA7GxZXzwn7CKKPmYuHGgxKSA AdpbpBZ3yW2rWbO19QHa2lFeblPaWmzDIbz09oA0pCven/4aK9SaOW8oYUTQb42NZoME sCKwUpdvAFqGKTnZj0WVJOtaWBzZktXNY2D6rMXdzPkHPhrO/71+aqMt9uiwT7ANrgl8 kQFw== X-Received: by 10.194.171.97 with SMTP id at1mr9374972wjc.39.1447789129722; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:38:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from winky.hogwarts (HSI-KBW-109-193-111-125.hsi7.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de. [109.193.111.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q1sm41412232wje.39.2015.11.17.11.38.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:38:49 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by winky.hogwarts (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CD6D916E05E1; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 20:38:49 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <564B67E7.7030405@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:46:15 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:108837 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 11/17/2015 07:40 PM, Andreas Matthias wrote: > >> Tested with: >> >> etags (GNU Emacs 24.3) >> >> etags (GNU Emacs 24.5) > > Could you test with emacs from the branch emacs-25? We've had some major-ish > changes in etags recently. commit 58e6235007e6761fb9734b942ecff94bf4e9ba68 etags (GNU Emacs 25.1.50) This one creates the same TAGS file... Hmm... Am I doing something wrong...? Andreas