From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25105: M-p in diff-mode jumps too far Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:49:17 -0500 Message-ID: <877f5yza02.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <87a8aydxe4.fsf@gmail.com> <3c2e407b-8ba2-1791-15e6-a0be6dac2897@yandex.ru> <87fuknzem8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87d1frzcil.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484358569 13100 195.159.176.226 (14 Jan 2017 01:49:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:49:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Mark Oteiza , 25105@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Dima Kogan , Dmitry Gutov To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 02:49:25 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSDT2-0001iW-Ad for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:49:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46045 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSDSz-0000q6-QZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSDSt-0000pr-Ip for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:49:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSDSo-0005ue-Ox for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37811) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSDSo-0005uS-Lb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSDSo-0002Ds-DB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25105 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 25105-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25105.14843585008486 (code B ref 25105); Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jan 2017 01:48:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53210 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSDS7-0002Co-UH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:48:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com ([209.85.214.68]:33156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSDS7-0002CY-99 for 25105@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 20:48:19 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id v14so6864404itb.0 for <25105@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 17:48:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=C6kdBJe4gC4bKOBcQXHdrK5ALx/WStL05ugkWYa1gG8=; b=ZpEGtLs+pkzj4uh+QlNNKpZobVMeTwf67gZnLLCXZLMctLkf6B4XpIBwDuN2o5JKB9 5BzaZMzRbaZQqJQ3LU08UtN0oacDgwqWSEKYVvRNTYu7v+7PsCmdV/HtYoO9lFp7qD8t jsIgDt3fGBDuwa740Fp6CLfPRvV5b3Q2aAjddsjr3s6hjxoYPNukfo9O81uZk4imv5ZO o0Tjozxdi9EaCREI9MHKFj9jPgvLgv4lHY5DMKRF+JGgkMQoA4KXLjyIE1+h2xKtKlid 4Ho3NP5oDAyrDuJXfnIxgkh9GveeoZCGvqL1xlOo/+fYY2GlTaN6Jv7XnI3fBsQjfZ/i puPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=C6kdBJe4gC4bKOBcQXHdrK5ALx/WStL05ugkWYa1gG8=; b=IIJFEIWlmBV3EOGzaGXSxpr9Hamp0TW46zYCPdf1WfJZt+iKerHdwOhRLN4DNw0mhb q7gpyBU0kBvvvTejaeE7brYxoLOknoE05L7kjjOjA6xHFqy0Z/o60fbGVdEC1cycJFLg l7tvGoEwthZSqco54wQ2fUXSv71YJSP2n2rrvCYq0zKqe3V96YmlAgaBc7C4npIaWAa2 XvKgeGL2QvKdXCacU9dWA+3xU4HgMjXz7TxiZdcnu2FNNolL2S3IyXO+8VlRImaCshwL MRKLxYQ0rk8573OViZRVRID0vVeI35YRLP/RtWha0E3Zqo8PrS/3QkOvYvHldjS6E7Hw 2krw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLDSsmYjiBkmmEN86j/Sypo/y/7mIDnXXpQLcRJuMvj62sDIDMaJvk6b88UR7LwwQ== X-Received: by 10.36.204.9 with SMTP id x9mr5628071itf.123.1484358493656; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 17:48:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o138sm1892653itc.18.2017.01.13.17.48.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 17:48:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Tino Calancha's message of "Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:54:28 +0900 (JST)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128096 Archived-At: Tino Calancha writes: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2017, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > >> Hmm, I'm still getting duplicates. Maybe I shouldn't have merged? Oh well. > Could be because i answered the e-mail to you and CC to Bug#25105? If you > are registered to that bug you might get 2 e-mails. I think that's the normal case, and usually I don't get duplicated mails. >> I was thinking more about this summary line. And maybe add some higher >> level explanation before the ChangeLog entry about the problems being >> solved? > How about copy verbatim the comentary from Dima in 2c8a7e5? He explained > very clearly the problem, and i am solving the same thing. > Mention to the regressions should must appear in the previous commit, > where i do the actual revert. Yes, that looks good, though if I understand correctly, the important difference is that the navigation commands are not changed in your patch, only the manipulation ones, right?