From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#30190: 27.0.50; term run in line mode shows user passwords Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:33:18 -0400 Message-ID: <877eln5de9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r2qjh0fs.fsf@gmail.com> <87mv17nwe4.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87efm259s5.fsf@gmail.com> <83vafe9f16.fsf@gnu.org> <87wozfkt9t.fsf@gmail.com> <87o9kiejd4.fsf@gmail.com> <83606q6xr7.fsf@gnu.org> <873718qpme.fsf@gmail.com> <87in6erte5.fsf@gmail.com> <83efh1s9s3.fsf@gnu.org> <87602drqan.fsf@gmail.com> <8336xgsvt3.fsf@gnu.org> <878t6892pv.fsf@gmail.com> <87zhyo6qkb.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1532284328 15684 195.159.176.226 (22 Jul 2018 18:32:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:32:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 30190@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 22 20:32:04 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fhJ9H-0003xY-CT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 20:32:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57046 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhJBO-0004aw-5w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:34:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57853) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhJBF-0004aD-O2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhJBC-0000xh-FW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47678) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fhJBC-0000xX-Bz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fhJBC-0002Ob-0m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 30190 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed security Original-Received: via spool by 30190-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B30190.15322844089168 (code B ref 30190); Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 30190) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jul 2018 18:33:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fhJAe-0002No-Bp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:33:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:37323) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fhJAc-0002Nc-MC for 30190@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 14:33:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id p17-v6so20776738itc.2 for <30190@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 11:33:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=XBA3eJ6NKmpwPBA1vELtswmA4LmV/Jl9h1IlDyoBby8=; b=g3oVsZtOC5z+g13kmzuEemDjswJiq0k65XQE+di9EedgP610lLbun5prANQbDGOkuh m7uNrKQzXQnilrjVGsUsPWghxxpJn0Ee9YqLx3Dn0ZxCfImZSNsRZqDHLSmftn7rkKs9 DPAC7fuuWcwZSGJjCmQKIL4xes69EYxKh9NkvtTj7lcHenE/zMVTIrMqBHlb5STQ3i5w nvTQ6eei6Temf2S+GH8HR29Hma1PZ3yG7xTvCPmWaqvrjXy/VIqT2P/qypH+bK4Bfofo G2/Ved0OYhi0V81rNVq/11RR2HIxWHK2OSb9RssdEmJX5VRqCQLkn56BeXV0oG3Gk+2O kTeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=XBA3eJ6NKmpwPBA1vELtswmA4LmV/Jl9h1IlDyoBby8=; b=iDspF84i0yY7m5iK6XbcNOhXryqaWnqqEURouaUb8UgIgEBdSDdpemTm6RqPhaTi/o 5V8NQ6GCW4EhgEWqXLHMeP/uHKKpmf/j0JQc55zdV+BSnvCnYsWLkQQAwjgIv0Y6frGd QGpwOQRcWGww43bIGhAmJrKqjUQ4cMy0rSmGz+0JEhjxi5e5EXTr5OdHKfXnbom273DI BJw2UU578l1VCa7IteV7TdFYnB3Gr/q5VXdMWuF5Ec4Ps0ZoQAMcA8vBV40JHAvV2V/N DdzoX7lIB+QkyWE+g14Y0lINEH3yC4pW86cIBZyIhjrsYlxVDcEITBTv2VS4ZngioW8H zG0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlE/5+66MGe1aaGbv2UWTzbv+RScxlXdo7OAZL5vO1q5jzXH5vCo 9OM7vsqGz4DNsDqyn/YLDDc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcyo7yhKH5SC8GBGFELLoAD/exA+C/1glo3Yoe7kzs9qnWtXWV30J17pvi+AAa9y2AWI/9/lQ== X-Received: by 2002:a02:9d03:: with SMTP id n3-v6mr8616547jak.113.1532284400947; Sun, 22 Jul 2018 11:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t191-v6sm4088838ita.28.2018.07.22.11.33.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 22 Jul 2018 11:33:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 18 Jul 2018 22:00:31 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:148829 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> - (setq str (term-read-noecho "Non-echoed text: " t))) >> + (setq str (read-passwd "Non-echoed text: "))) > > I believe this remove the last use of term-read-noecho, so I think we > can then get rid of it (or at least mark it obsolete). Makes sense. I guess the obsoletion should go to master? Eli, is the patch in #131 okay for emacs-26? https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=30190#131