From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34776: Acknowledgement (27.0.50; Some questions about choose-completion-string-functions) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:22:14 -0700 Message-ID: <877ec2iau1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <871s3jeh8m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhq4zzcz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871s3a90qo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87imvmbube.fsf@gmail.com> <87mukyiczg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="103524"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 34776@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 09:23:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hE7Zf-000QqI-7v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:23:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54875 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE7Ze-0002CA-7M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE7ZX-0002C4-Qt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE7ZW-0006kv-RK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hE7ZW-0006km-Lp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE7ZW-0001Ln-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34776 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34776-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34776.15548809445131 (code B ref 34776); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34776) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Apr 2019 07:22:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE7Yu-0001Kg-Ds for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:22:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:50508 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hE7Yr-0001KR-HV for 34776@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 03:22:22 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (97-113-35-98.tukw.qwest.net [97.113.35.98]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0FC3FA05C; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 07:22:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ericabrahamsen.net; s=mail; t=1554880936; bh=YjRQMl9OLHysUe/EMZGXuZ6y9jwKeCONrv/ZTyQVXV0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=rKhDj7jMVf/9XDypTadlMxxyUXlOEeKu9bMfUkmR8exqBpsxOKNsYWf36ZEdu/T37 0w4nVC7PAgNbSWaIqSXrnvddbOkewp+iqkbmt/TfTfr+08t/K7TiMhPDmKj4QdQCyi LrEIBNEFwd9KurD4jgxz+lcUWrLtoDHeMEyraffI= In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:01:04 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157450 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > On April 10, 2019 9:35:47 AM GMT+03:00, Eric Abrahamsen wrote: >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > On April 10, 2019 6:29:10 AM GMT+03:00, Glenn Morris >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > And it can go to emacs-26 since it's a doc fix. >> >> >> >> The RC said Emacs 26.2 was to be released March 27... >> >> Part of making a release is for people to stop changing that >> branch. >> > >> > Unfortunately, that ship has sailed, since within an hour of RC >> > release a new commit was pushed to the release branch, and another >> one >> > a week later, without asking. So now the RC tarball will not be able >> > to be renamed anyway, and the rationale for withholding doc changes >> is >> > null and void. >> > >> > "Best laid plans" and all that. >> >> This sounds like a job for a git hook. I pay fairly close attention to >> emacs.devel for someone who isn't an Emacs dev, and apparently I >> missed >> this billboard. > > Not sure which billboard jou think you missed, but in general, I don't > see here any problem for which a commit hook would be a good solution. > The existing hooks are already annoying enough, and are too easy to > bypass to be reliable. What I meant was: if 200 people have the ability to push to the repo, but 50 of them aren't checking the mailing lists regularly, then you call a halt to an RC, that's 50 people who don't know they shouldn't push. It seems like a lot more work to chase after those 50 than to close the gate and reject pushes to that particular release.