From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36837: 26.2; whitespace-mode: whitespace-line-column is not set to local fill-column Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 17:30:41 +0200 Message-ID: <877e7vfuu6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20190729111756.0665feb6@ventiloplattform.tastytea.de> <87k1bvfwda.fsf@gmail.com> <874l2zvcak.fsf@igel.home> <87ftmjfvpw.fsf@gmail.com> <83a7crfvbm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="138141"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/27.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: tastytea@tastytea.de, schwab@linux-m68k.org, 36837@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 02 17:31:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1htZWQ-000Ziq-EC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 17:31:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35790 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htZWP-0006M8-GS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:31:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htZWJ-0006Go-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htZWI-00065P-EK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:31:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1htZWI-00065D-Ai for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htZWI-0005dc-45 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36837 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36837-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36837.156475985121655 (code B ref 36837); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36837) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2019 15:30:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htZW6-0005dC-Gx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:30:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:36730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1htZW4-0005cx-I6 for 36837@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 11:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id n4so77692337wrs.3 for <36837@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:30:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MBmFRq2Likvaspje4enYTbCTHMvzWIHAD40tMS0lmSU=; b=glVF8tBVWIITZNftwBr4+gASYZnShj/YiIWHfKw6O+sF1j7kwMsPWiD/fqG0xE5fTT F7EEmumSk27cuv/RIDne5NW5VUOK6rL+o5dV9r83UBtdIUOnqcz873tKeuBtKG7+ebGe UTRXBsIbw2xUSnYTYsD5UDliccZLuC+uZLnyaVUNmrv8y/0Z6+OaQj9t/vDP0eccG85+ VZECGxCghvXjMcsDeuZ/UUY9fsIAUV7VStiV+JAYllTiZ/8nhOkmfqfKbw88Gt3Sz5WU Tdu1bwLtRs+2vgnM2DVqKHqL+gZre/YPtBS8DYDzZTnVuB+hVBQDXgZ59IJYDbeMofXD 3/HA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MBmFRq2Likvaspje4enYTbCTHMvzWIHAD40tMS0lmSU=; b=Jy93XdFBu8A/5UbEX3Uc30kNI5jgmJhAbD25nI8lTksdSJHbZ9Fe0iCHSZ9gpEB1a0 uyloK6/a4yQ3q3IarmdWLGszx9bdMfqmqtN0/7ZZ8bWzPcPdoA4wBgbe4wJafIlBuR6w 11uHnFph2sW+lcXrgE9HrnzJ+bmEVjK7rCG+Koc+MIyUPC9a+Jr7g+3dzPf8Suyv22rN PNut7c+Gk8qmFZVdhxGKdUgVXpUMd4YL6WnxqhtzqsrzJJvUUQ7PEp+0ue4ibzOKJLzg 0kTtMMIap9Cf9cc1FwQyYJ57V+gCFVfkqSS5fMcwFdQpj/cHOycz5CHCWcN+74goJYq3 EWVw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/7beL1pyACxX9iAump4CTK2hmbUtjQHIPk5mvOFZ6yhfdAiVQ wWvlAp+5B/eOj5d0rbJtdsM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyAsdPdqN532jNGij6c+h8oyELn4aUYUQb6bBM1goQrCqMHM+VyvVEJNIy8OYDrVbiCnAyKPQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4d81:: with SMTP id b1mr67636303wru.27.1564759842785; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([185.112.167.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f70sm104366562wme.22.2019.08.02.08.30.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 02 Aug 2019 08:30:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83a7crfvbm.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164368 Archived-At: On Fri, 02 Aug 2019 18:20:13 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Sure, but isn't that precisely an argument for the reverse order? > > No. The logic here is that a mode hook is more general than > file-local variables (because a mode hook affects _all_ files that are > visited with that mode). Precisely. Maybe I'm being thick, but have you (and Andreas) actually read what I wrote? I.e., instead of restating the obvious (mode hooks are more general and should be overridden by file-local variables; no disagreement there), could you provide some concrete counter-arguments to my arguments? --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n