From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33005: 27.0.50; Data loss with Gnus registry Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:30:53 +0200 Message-ID: <877e55xcj6.fsf@web.de> References: <871s8yvsrq.fsf@web.de> <87in29x33z.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2gxygox.fsf@web.de> <87efcxwzr2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874ldtlcks.fsf@web.de> <87ftxdl7w1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <878t33cjf2.fsf@web.de> <87o8za4gbl.fsf@web.de> <87mueuicys.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87d0fgnik0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87v9srzm9g.fsf@web.de> <87ftjvz045.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87tv8ajd6d.fsf@web.de> <87lftlsr90.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="153238"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 33005@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Abrahamsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 16 11:32:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iKffk-000dj0-0a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:32:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40132 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKffi-0003PF-Bq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:32:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iKff3-0003Mc-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKff2-0005uL-UW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:32:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36430) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iKff2-0005u6-Kg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:32:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKfez-0000jY-UO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:32:04 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33005 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 33005-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33005.15712182662755 (code B ref 33005); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33005) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2019 09:31:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45251 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKfe6-0000iL-D5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:31:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:36087) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iKfe4-0000hr-5S for 33005@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:31:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1571218246; bh=UFnIPdC4hWMkyKG40l4yZJzj8+98ItRI5Jc73wNi39Y=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=HKuc9GwGbDhZYie0ut8T8p2soTVDM0azFwAyGv1wDJbGTGE7v0pRrG/fX9Xn0n8Rn rp/1aYSC4qD58oV6O1fVmoqDEEwED6WXdtWDv95zjfsSYf9MgodESpOj880d4TPjkO pr+JQuL+WKh6l8l7mFr/vEQ/ymov/D71k6vOhy/A= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.222.9]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M3Bdr-1i1UYr0iGt-00stqK; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 11:30:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lftlsr90.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> (Eric Abrahamsen's message of "Tue, 15 Oct 2019 13:11:55 -0700") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:WoYvYLsM7Hge/2to9fSaJbQ7oXeZqpdDPLVXUZA6WofzmqCNKBO JOQMdjOZPOpoeBq0ol8pQA+uPsa+M9l9Bg6yDNFmNQ0jAHfR51gKRO+NzPa6krB68X1Yaio R7v89EPapPNChd5Hc6zw60Oamx2+aQUhfFTm+ouHB0esPGtoVhwms3JUtQTePCGhxiFCyy6 RtioxzC7jQfUEAYtRnwzw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:wycQ1gfza+A=:6cqBdE0nI/gV2I8qlKTUbp cUfPXs50PFXCixAbqbm+TaHh8Sd5w8cxjT3bnZz44aGrIwwAtBzZMmyamg5vwNpjnLAzeaU2+ /t5zsOZP/gkTYbKDQEh2isKZ3GW6K3Bx1IUS+N7opG9OuUslfbzrZ8SZKjZEkdxgDgQqVqco0 EamC4WpMlS3kctHA/EYnB941/cfEyEwu04OLsTwr2IPFbVJ9u5gSgU1Pbd0V62bFudqQVzcoY gsEc6/ziowzrwL8ojwVbKIIyEH4xZxxOKEF16Mrm19wkYFDCxXrkcEqoEf54jYfGUg58nD5yu KhQppvAevxcKdP9Sr4qhcbkAL5CQq8BB7MAIMo5g05bfu7dnuuAjllvv6tu8lrUpqcGB5rjmC vhfgzwTv3t4jnNs5guMwSVQ4n21Ag5ZQG1NPTy2GCRhmdU+z9XMCKQ21zqsa99Xcrkok/NBuW +zOdUgIIlj+Fse6JB1lD0UZWg6puonDqKxdI+Lds9f2gXrgRbT0Ssqi23/FSe0klW6OmeOrBh wmOSpkSRoEHXxYC738xyhIayQzAnz7gR81xgoVaZYxWs6HHdxFO24UxJVRUEQNY2gXnhKpPjq 5D6bcoomGTJl0AYT6qwbvureWmkwPloayhCFDf92neXEhUS04SiKw3e71xpEjlB0xlq5KEKh2 YWziKp1y8CjuvyrptB5pc7kN4nEnn9bHLZpwdnCdconSKGtGbZ0NDK4oWSknNuxdTysvqOIlx ggzRyHoDs9L51VcHIKdscsNzDnFEGoGki1svkCxPcX1OdXhcGHmk7H7S6nm0+YaMy7CwYORG X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:169431 Archived-At: Eric Abrahamsen writes: > > Oh, and you also noted that part > > > >> Sorry for the bad news - but my registry marks are disappearing again > >> :-( Just after restarting Gnus they are gone. > > > > in one of my previous messages, right? > Anything other way to narrow this down? Hmm, currently I can't reproduce either. I'll start using registry marks again in real life and see if it works reliable now. One little thing that bothers me however: when I hit M M i, or when I remove a mark with M M I, the article line gets doubled: one line has the mark, and the other doesn't. Do you see that too? Regards, Michael.