From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38053: 27.0.50; base64url-encode-region Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:26:01 +0100 Message-ID: <877e43otxi.fsf@gnus.org> References: <837e4fiqxc.fsf@gnu.org> <83o8xrgfoa.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="8366"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 38053@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 14 07:27:27 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iV8bE-0001zf-Du for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:27:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53756 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iV8bC-0007Wq-T0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:27:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iV8ay-0007WN-JX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:27:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iV8aw-0001h3-Iv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:27:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51946) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iV8at-0001gN-Qu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:27:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iV8ar-0007PH-Kc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:27:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38053 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38053-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38053.157371277228399 (code B ref 38053); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 06:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38053) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2019 06:26:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60764 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iV8a4-0007Nz-6V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:50180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iV8a2-0007Nk-MV for 38053@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:26:11 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iV8Zu-00011V-Av; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:26:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83o8xrgfoa.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 05 Nov 2019 05:33:57 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171543 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > We could rename that, but the name base64-url-encoder would not be >> > familiar to users, so it would be a disadvantage. >> >> What was the first release that base64url-encode-region was in? > > Emacs 27, so renaming is not a problem from the POV. The problem is > that this is the name of that conversion, we didn't invent it > ourselves. I don't think there's anything here to fix -- the encoding is called "base64url", so the command name is logical. So I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no