From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35481: 25.2; table.el should use 'font-lock-face' instead of 'face' Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 10:07:06 +0100 Message-ID: <877e3yan2d.fsf@gnus.org> References: <89093c47-6449-8518-1d77-d43ba9b68891@gmail.com> <87d0eeow6p.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="189382"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35481@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastian Urban Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 17 10:08:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iWGXV-000n7y-3P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 10:08:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWGXT-0006Uy-Rv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:08:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55895) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWGXM-0006RP-AB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:08:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWGXL-0005qT-7X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:08:04 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59689) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWGXL-0005q3-4Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWGXJ-0002Pl-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 09:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35481 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch easy confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 35481-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35481.15739816389215 (code B ref 35481); Sun, 17 Nov 2019 09:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35481) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2019 09:07:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40274 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWGWc-0002OZ-5a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:07:18 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iWGWa-0002OJ-2P for 35481@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:07:16 -0500 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iWGWR-0005BY-25; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 10:07:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87d0eeow6p.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed, 30 Oct 2019 20:44:14 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171784 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I grepped around, but other modes don't seem to care about that. But I > guess it's somewhat unusual for a minor mode to do stuff like this? > > I think putting both font-lock-face and face on the text would do the > trick here, but is that the way to go? There weren't any comments in two weeks, and this change does fix the problem (if inelegantly), so I've applied it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no