From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35546: 27.0.50; setf return value for new alist entries is wrong Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:47:24 +0200 Message-ID: <877dykdg6b.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87lfznzm08.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftpqmrz9.fsf@web.de> <878svimlbz.fsf@web.de> <85zhnyxqey.fsf@gmail.com> <8736lqmf5p.fsf@web.de> <85woj2xl7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87blnwdh4j.fsf@gmail.com> <875ze451dl.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="129282"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Michael Heerdegen , 35546@debbugs.gnu.org, Tassilo Horn To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 12 14:47:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNc11-000XYP-0D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 14:47:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33270 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNc0z-0008Hy-On for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55377) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNc0t-0008HP-1I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:47:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNc0s-0008MA-6B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNc0s-0008M3-3j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNc0s-0007YG-1M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 12:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35546 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35546-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35546.158669561729019 (code B ref 35546); Sun, 12 Apr 2020 12:47:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35546) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2020 12:46:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNc0n-0007Xy-KR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-f180.google.com ([209.85.208.180]:42216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jNc0m-0007Xl-9n for 35546@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:46:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id q19so6220196ljp.9 for <35546@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:46:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gEjsLk496KPpnnm7dvlxu/BfVriB/Fz7TemkOJu0ZbY=; b=DsRmuWnDEqvfFW15/+usy9FTW/0FPT+3XqMAVfWBO4L9AFqsYVxXEh+syN/YhJ88dV 3s/U+hxx4Oq/TpX6QPGVq6WZ91OJNldkCKmg5t7dBoL2cJUgch7HiQ4SOo7yTrgVk6xr 1ITBxb9dPq5+5XGjD0nSKmy905uiZEFaJbGyxY00Mk95KbgQyAX/0PHgDAKpdmaZwqUa QbZAEcykU52ejds+McFixgTs1R4u8TGJug998kzFeQTcxWwKaa+BxNR7hwi8sYzIaeKD ++N6yAg7ltl15Jfror9O6xorg9b1HAWkFa7bCytXmUwbAZo7GE3IGgAgW/03uE3jt7n5 RZJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gEjsLk496KPpnnm7dvlxu/BfVriB/Fz7TemkOJu0ZbY=; b=Ne9y78jCY2kX+lw0Y0VJcNsaZ8HUqyQ5QR4Rm1jIh/SVjOVKIeBBKXcUZNwSyc4X1v pYPJ+eSlHT6/5KNSXbLAJIcfnzS7w8mkdYDYFuBFek+PWRb7Eap0lPAA5Hu3TD8TYQGO XXHn4MlYXWkph25aV4P8QqaItW5DvCEsp09kIrZy2g7W0r2QW03vAdQ4dF4ILTfhISIy FWCq7Y3NNMh3IYQpZpXRR0Nq0hClehK9rN72JW6jhtC5Xs1dCi1gwm5F1UaO2Bm+B3lX H0U5USb1DDiGPRfyEvpdvZ06bbFq5HYWN4tO2LWvxnsZNJxz+vH0g4RKTurUYMWRPeDn ldEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZHmALJx4qEvo+sUwiltzSJyODT6ZdJd2IMPzH9GdA9IhbGrwIF wnX8W7lvKK6Pv8LAfC5y1Ng= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJUKwjq9mzwd/1l+QFRKqRtTNJZaVtpK8eM+bptdhczagDFsupexLa9lK/HlEBXK0HI4enq/A== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b5d0:: with SMTP id g16mr8027417ljn.106.1586695610254; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([185.112.167.47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o6sm5322406lji.15.2020.04.12.05.46.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:46:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <875ze451dl.fsf@gmail.com> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:34:14 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:178241 Archived-At: On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 08:34:14 -0400 Noam Postavsky wrote: > =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec writes: > >> (lambda (v) >> + (macroexp-let2 nil v v > > Binding v to the value of v seems needlessly confusing. How about > renaming the lambda parameter to valexp or somthing like that? I kind of agree, although really, I wish that would be the most confusing part about gv.el. :-] I did it like that because 1. this practice seems pretty common in Emacs sources already, 2. it makes for the minimal change here. I am certainly not against renaming the variable, though. Thanks, =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n