From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23966: 25.1.50; Frame resizing due to tool bar + Gnus Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:50:57 +0200 Message-ID: <877duya51a.fsf@rub.de> References: <87vb09u40u.fsf@gmx.net> <57867BB6.1020601@gmx.at> <87r3axtkcf.fsf@gmx.net> <578754F3.9060800@gmx.at> <87a8hkpmq8.fsf@gmx.net> <5787CCF5.3000404@gmx.at> <87eg6wghgl.fsf@gmx.net> <874lkgtqnk.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87h8ofcvqb.fsf@gmx.net> <87wo2zmr20.fsf@gnus.org> <87eep6a6w7.fsf@rub.de> <87blkajzx7.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30740"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stephen Berman , 23966@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 20 11:52:45 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jxSTV-0007vi-34 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:52:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40744 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jxSTT-0007E5-UZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:52:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jxSSn-0007DX-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jxSSn-0006Kp-LY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:52:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxSSn-0003as-K5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23966 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 23966-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23966.159523867013723 (code B ref 23966); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 09:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23966) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2020 09:51:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxSRy-0003ZC-Ds for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:58511) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jxSRt-0003YG-71 for 23966@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 05:51:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1595238658; bh=MODNB40Xx2b8Lrrlu+gPZBrQcWccu69ZdYlwXo8FkkE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=elmvPfxSjIWw/Q4ZapJhXBs+SBboKOnhvdx+gZJ6fAGcdYPWL4tBtY4KGTK54xD8Q H9131CVtcFy9ARz0bKGoCuqIsQCpS0t2OwpH6jTVsQNugk5wMCTTl9sZGtr9Uf0vr6 oM3N0iRAcAposk/H+75N3Z91td36bKv9aBeZCGUM= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from strobe-jhalfs ([178.9.98.4]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MqJqD-1kbS6r1ljP-00nUIh; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:50:58 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87blkajzx7.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:31:16 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:1e8sBvNVdQo8T6Jpztg2yjCPKQSCQa9ZukAn7sAS3ZnrqKswU3m u244J5L+4VJJjwzqLPDghWuyxQSkG1/pWd3iojcYpEUb6ke+Kuu9HR8giMjDyY7Vdp9McrI d/Cr9/ahAdrZPFlFvGVdZWMX7fZA3K/SVb/spFKNe0PsV2sTwJ+O6cF/vrEtIK0pK/qF1g7 TrFE0PnvoCqDNxCVs7U9A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:++4aMbjYZQM=:sV5sVcUPjGdGJL7Nu4zLuP J4mXqsVfaRwIvdIn243JLIi7g706aKH7F4PFy0oqKMFCQIKLm5nq+Fpxp5Veskb+KFaDsKRVX nlJdboAPR7rFQwtRJo5m+iWhqxUsP9JAN4rSZbl9LtrJYFRWGg4Ix2sBNpFqn9Jei/COhU37Q Le7qebeRuZ8hPF2vG2m+WyROTFnf4AdKmnHRIMUT7bIOqZf8ZcImPWdhjdzvschnNBcl8hpXU dBGmu3noQLA6Wu4sIQ1lYn9shNEV9Jwl/ISCyeeDpeOK0tguqKlpiGwsdNU0R2Nnle3BRDaVQ jGwfwvsKbVHhDgD9p0DWCJGMOX4APFicCek/ptrpQfhy6iGXdkn8jNf7nKd7OA8XKSFV8iTHF z5PU6QMumx89Hzogg27m9UbXDwYcSJCaDkag8pD8/anSFfI+ME6Qv/Y6X0p3aCSR/P1SatW9o NKdA2RWTnHJTnKarM4FpPn9jpZLJIQG4w7ujWczgqT8ng4CIoPaJ9iDxs5aCV3a0lq/uO9FcO PrCK1In0SEnFvPv4UqiQaSUAO4ZHN5ShO/27qz2zFP7mh9RMKBVIaw9mpQGiQ2KW1bNJ10U/S doMZG/ctVhZVGYItRRoscQb6A2Ld4MLplYS6qh0B4Y7MpBOSE8sJns1pjh8gTMSl43XiYIdCl 3KSNjate61CUvAO+ZWLQkzYd+brFWFbnSSIMBsVNOop2FxVqR3hkQgdLLkdsgqhwayp992PvI ZGsBcOQdJ7EMRlS3rs8sYnFWSLaixdLNRXEJcc8lxyCFuGLr5MYV3G9ZC5DNLw6Uc534S70n X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:183297 Archived-At: On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:31:16 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> Moreover, I get these exact same results regardless of whether >> frame-resize-pixelwise it nil or t, which is different from two years >> ago, and also when I set gmm-tool-bar-style to 'gnome or >> gnus-summary-tool-bar to 'gnus-summary-tool-bar-gnome before evaluating >> the test code. > > If you switch tool-bar-mode on before starting Gnus (well, before > loading anything else), do you get a proper tool bar in Gnus buffers? Yes. > In that case, I think we're seeing the same thing... On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:33:56 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Hm! If I call > > (gnus-summary-make-tool-bar) > > after switching tool-bar-mode on (in the summary buffer), I then get a > proper tool bar. Me too. On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:43:06 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > As somebody who doesn't use tool bars normally, I'm wondering -- do we > really need two different tool bar styles in Gnus? Can't we just rip > out the `retro' stuff and thing will possibly be less confusing? I stopped regularly using tool bars a while ago, and even before I don't think I knew about the Gnus retro tool bar... so as far as I'm concerned, rip away! Steve Berman