From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49033: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Feature suggestion, url-cache-expiry-alist to override expire time for cache pruning Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 14:56:40 +0200 Message-ID: <877diq108n.fsf@turtle-trading.net> References: <87r1h3tdys.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37997"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 49033@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alex Bochannek Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 19 14:57:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1luaXA-0009eY-6w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 14:57:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53912 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luaX9-0004Yq-92 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 08:57:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luaX0-0004Yc-GI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 08:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luaX0-0002xr-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 08:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luaX0-0001bC-17 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 08:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Benjamin Riefenstahl Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 12:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49033 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 49033-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49033.16241074146133 (code B ref 49033); Sat, 19 Jun 2021 12:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49033) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2021 12:56:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luaWr-0001ar-V5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 08:56:54 -0400 Original-Received: from odoacer.turtle-trading.net ([93.241.193.16]:49915) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luaWp-0001aZ-T9 for 49033@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 08:56:52 -0400 Original-Received: from zenobia.turtle-trading.net ([192.168.2.109]) by odoacer.turtle-trading.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1luaWe-0006SH-Mq; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 14:56:40 +0200 Original-Received: from benny by zenobia.turtle-trading.net with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1luaWe-0001xd-LT; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 14:56:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Alex Bochannek's message of "Tue, 15 Jun 2021 15:55:54 -0700") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:208725 Archived-At: Hi Alex, >>> - ;; Twelve hours. >>> - (* 12 60 60)))) >>> + gravatar-cache-ttl))) > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >> I don't mind that -- but is this really something that somebody would >> want to control? It just seemed unlikely to me. Alex Bochannek writes: > I tend to find it difficult to reason about functionality if constants > like this are in the code and not in variables. Maybe use defconst instead? Just a drive-by thought, benny