unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 53729@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:37:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dacpe2k.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83bkzo5rgs.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 03 Feb 2022 09:39:31 +0200")

[வியாழன், பிப்ரவரி 03 2022] Eli Zaretskii wrote:

Hello, Eli

>> From: Visuwesh <visuweshm@gmail.com>
>> Cc: 53729@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 07:15:01 +0530
>> 
>> > on the mode line, the buffer is shown in bold, so perhaps there's a
>> > problem with the bold variant of the Noto Serif Tamil font?  If you
>> > type the same text in a buffer, but give it the 'bold' face, do you
>> > see the same problem with buffer text as on the mode line?
>> 
>> No, when I give it the bold face and insert it in a buffer, the text is
>> shaped properly.  Then, I tried setting mode-line-format to
>> "அக்கிச்சிறகுகள்" and '(:propertize "அக்கிச்சிறகுகள்" face bold) and in both
>> cases, the text is shaped properly.  I'm not sure where the problem is
>> anymore.  I attached screenshots of the same as well.
>
> Strange.  I guess the only way of investigating this is to step with
> GDB into the code which renders the mode line, and see which font
> specifically is being used there?
>

I suppose so but I'm confident that "Noto Serif Tamil" is the font used
in the modeline.  The only other Tamil font I have installed is "Noto
Sans Tamil" and I can easily make out the difference between the two.
Font selection does not seem to be the problem, at least.

In either case, I think I can only get to this in two weeks.  And is the
information in etc/DEBUG all I need (except the breakpoint which will be
provided?)?

> Btw, do I understand correctly that the problem you see is the
> incorrect location of the dot-like diacriticals above the letters?  Or
> is the problem something else?  (I don't read the Tamil script.)

You're right.  In the OP, even simple combinations like க + ் is not
rendered right: the dot should be on top of க but in the buffer name, it
is next to it.  However, Emacs seems to have no problem shaping க + ி.
The grossest of all is க + ு where the combined letter should be க plus
some kind of arc that surrounds the letter i.e., கு (hopefully Emacs
renders this fine on your end, if not, I guess I could write it down on
paper and send a picture).

I really hope the above explains the problems with shaping.





  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-03  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-02 16:55 bug#53729: 29.0.50; Tamil text not shaped in modeline Visuwesh
2022-02-02 18:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-03  1:45   ` Visuwesh
2022-02-03  7:39     ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-03  8:07       ` Visuwesh [this message]
2022-02-03  9:23         ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-03 10:05           ` Visuwesh
     [not found]             ` <877da2amw9.fsf@gmail.com>
2022-02-13 13:53               ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-13 14:56                 ` Visuwesh
2022-02-13 16:44                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-14  3:01                     ` Visuwesh
2022-02-14 14:05                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-15  1:47                         ` Visuwesh
2022-02-15 14:26                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-16 14:06                             ` Visuwesh
2022-02-16 14:07                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-18 12:03                               ` Visuwesh
2022-02-18 12:59                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-18 13:20                                   ` Visuwesh
2022-02-19  4:20                             ` Jai Vetrivelan
2022-02-19  4:51                               ` Visuwesh
2022-02-19  5:22                                 ` Jai Vetrivelan
2022-02-19  5:31                                   ` Jai Vetrivelan
2022-02-19  8:23                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-19  9:22                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-02-19 10:27                                   ` Visuwesh
2022-02-19 12:38                                     ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877dacpe2k.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=visuweshm@gmail.com \
    --cc=53729@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).