From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gustavo Barros Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57856: 28.2; bookmark context strings in encrypted files Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:30:19 -0300 Message-ID: <877d23h4df.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bkrfh77i.fsf@gmail.com> <87mtaz8quf.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30034"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.8.10; emacs 28.2 Cc: 57856@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 16 14:49:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oZAmM-0007ha-10 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:49:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45860 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZAmK-0005vW-Tm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZAmE-0005vA-E1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZAmE-0004PY-5j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:49:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZAmE-0006Mi-15 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:49:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gustavo Barros Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57856 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 57856-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57856.166333252224437 (code B ref 57856); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57856) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2022 12:48:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZAlu-0006M5-Gl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:48:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-f173.google.com ([209.85.160.173]:41537) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZAlr-0006Lp-Fz for 57856@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 08:48:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-f173.google.com with SMTP id c11so15789826qtw.8 for <57856@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 05:48:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=dQ1M84Qq3xSCos7+U+UK6kw3XL3SJHuazWe7HWJ2nD4=; b=QP7XclwxiSEXlI5G4bA+q3N0KSSKlQm1Mf+0R1b7zMQxcCgN3wn86rAyz7OkgysDrg sVXgWc+wpTDUh8tKkTP5xPQnQx/T9onkPfTD4jWMaEXAG5kFt4rlM92dkZlWz6NisQez kgzSUjelyVw6VstiYwoVOXRSEdWCNp0Z3Vw5pVRaIh7Q6VItbuhQ5ntrjJGwQ30FbnYg jI+p0dQUimjgqagFr84yeJIGSdcAUiITKPwJS1/+jSzLNKvcPJD2IvGXkpDsq2PzDl6u DzxVEe+AAfPNAQPFeRGCWUnom2eqLDaB25APjCCCvGKKM5mDMc94nqxHuxLAPPt0xRHv W12Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to:from :user-agent:references:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date; bh=dQ1M84Qq3xSCos7+U+UK6kw3XL3SJHuazWe7HWJ2nD4=; b=0x0FxqA6a69rdUVTmfyNtrOqotfUlkOKKMK+ZbHtiScgtQcUuC7p7UwVO2K6ULAh7D 5dkuLzSCC3HOmdiCjn3Sp3NNODQdiX0anWHtxm90XEyNZa4xt1USJ5fFK14kxGuki6Zv zpukFKXxHVJIzjz5NIxqltV4BjHdsz7pBcMeSS0xQcdbAvE1C1Rr5Gswc8QFhBCbSsgc K78dS/ESNN0I/wsSw9UKE3AYA+4OFb09egDKSX6cCmACLKXvvqCI9UGAHBmYvjNVOlrG M3dzV8fW3WgxG4269duASRuNMGi9Jogueq0IVQFU6gOcQ/ggw+3i3MTeXOpvhdmV2hwI Uh6A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2Ow5t/HiJUNk2/TinsAewohZzyIcunkt7gLn5y1KQU026qtK9k Ip9UDGRd1I37/nZOFWlcFyuhQh/l+Hs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM40DQeiOYy2XDBl30jvLecLayReBu+YUKpUd9zFJeSjRi0pL8JLsvrA/YJ8lR8v0mJZShDpZg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:c4:b0:35c:cc56:6444 with SMTP id p4-20020a05622a00c400b0035ccc566444mr3792433qtw.289.1663332513630; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 05:48:33 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from gusbrs-laptop ([102.129.152.129]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 62-20020a370741000000b006b9ab3364ffsm5793109qkh.11.2022.09.16.05.48.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 05:48:32 -0700 (PDT) In-reply-to: <87mtaz8quf.fsf@gnus.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242755 Archived-At: Hi Lars, Thanks again for the very prompt response. On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 at 14:07, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Gustavo Barros writes: > >> It could be argued that it is unwise to set a bookmark in this >> context. But, well, users do all kind of stuff. Besides, Emacs >> provides no hint that this may be risky (as far as I can tell). So >> it >> would be nice if Emacs would be a little more conservative here, and >> locally set `bookmark-search-size' to 0 in buffers visiting encrypted >> files. > > I think that makes sense. Alternatively, we could prompt the user for > what to do in these files? > > Anybody have any opinions? If this were to be left to user discretion, I'd suggest a variable rather than a prompt. What would we ask? "This file is encrypted. Set bookmark, yes or no?" "Why wouldn't I? Yes." For the value of `bookmark-search-size'? "What's that? Default. RET" The general point is, how many users should we expect to know "at prompt time" that `bookmark.el' stores part of the buffer in the bookmark file and what it represents for an encrypted file? But, to be honest, I'm not even sure if this being optional is particularly meaningful. Do you see any use case where one would actually want to store unencrypted context of an encrypted file? Best regards, Gustavo.