From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Visuwesh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65387: [PATCH] New user option 'submit-emacs-patch-display-help' Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 13:26:26 +0530 Message-ID: <877cpqywnp.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83jztqyfbt.fsf@gnu.org> <83fs4exn5e.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4491"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eshel Yaron , 65387@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 20 09:57:16 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qXdJE-00012J-Pk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 09:57:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXdIz-0004IJ-N4; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 03:57:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXdIy-0004I3-NI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 03:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qXdIy-00069x-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 03:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qXdIz-0003Lt-UD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 03:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Visuwesh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 07:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65387 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 65387-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65387.169251819912856 (code B ref 65387); Sun, 20 Aug 2023 07:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65387) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2023 07:56:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53031 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qXdId-0003LI-CP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 03:56:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x1041.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1041]:62854) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qXdIb-0003L4-3N for 65387@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 03:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x1041.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-26934bc3059so2317682a91.1 for <65387@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 00:56:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692518189; x=1693122989; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=p65S8D+gESy3fAhzqOaQwkqqK9e2z1Kvd9bkhK4e0d0=; b=BAuPcAwKDV2XsWTVju4uEQQV2L5Aaio5NQL5DvQcbktcAPiX4JkWRx8hY9iutVfGJW h6e6TNfQpubyicGcZ1IgG8hTbb3lnZWQ8PyQg/WfnEZA51oIItdPzDCkgZUQ0KXJmlxK 4ep0be0EqOIf5UbpUIw41dO1od5qOoa95J+FgxFZGJ8zHmLdsQ5BbTTxLV0CdtT53fL9 yjinFCIDejzzBJZPcB0YfuW0pCHqiDes9Z1ioPTitv57LP3Ld7f6/SPPkcgYhL+oJ855 sZ8fyaxjk5r+sDESIXhZ746MkDIZhtkFzGeJmINgNcN6F8T+nunOAIQMtuLBMBmhWzZe PUHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692518189; x=1693122989; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=p65S8D+gESy3fAhzqOaQwkqqK9e2z1Kvd9bkhK4e0d0=; b=FCTuY6Ou6VsJdj5VIz1pw/VCqqfVvpHC5AnMgcnBnMB6bv9lsv6We8Sb+vZ5Oc/GPX dfLwpWulauDGmObbRyUp40Pejs6x4huVzFOZfZYKU6w5hrRnexPNUA3CGMEJ6sj9Iw3P BYpjrMb70k8BcZERabT/CKJRLHE89L2rhoYO9pfW1Gt//7EjlhgYMcK2wt9oikAaghm9 7UYPIiBYlKDldCoXHlsg/OG44WYN0tpqYWqdUFJCm2Zhh0F8bdC1S4B2ay0lVXIVhRqO Qy1sUMI9uZ6ooXC+QuYWgEkcoqqDBk5+pUfh4mByaHWydHJy6Gnc5DIPlPXOaEycRYDj e2pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzejn/73pevLbizutcUwOGhwFOAfM/EK60G1HN97bO42hq8K4IH IqlTX/Ql17zj1aGx/cDnRgU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG0aKQYKmhElumPLAlZyN7bvP9kjNdTz4kmeMtyycti3oMUoia5XrMStji9U6WLfS0Zpj+lCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:64ca:b0:25d:d224:9fb9 with SMTP id i10-20020a17090a64ca00b0025dd2249fb9mr4992325pjm.24.1692518189516; Sun, 20 Aug 2023 00:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([118.185.152.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8-20020a17090a1a4800b002677739860fsm4394312pjl.34.2023.08.20.00.56.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 20 Aug 2023 00:56:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83fs4exn5e.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 20 Aug 2023 09:07:09 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:267963 Archived-At: [=E0=AE=9E=E0=AE=BE=E0=AE=AF=E0=AE=BF=E0=AE=B1=E0=AF=81 =E0=AE=86=E0=AE=95= =E0=AE=B8=E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=9F=E0=AF=8D 20, 2023] Eli Zaretskii wrote: =20 >> Ah I actually find this command quite convenient, except for that >> instructions buffer that tends to get in my way. So I guess this option >> is useful for us semi-newbies :) >>=20 >> I don't know if it justifies a new option, as you say, and I don't mind >> keeping a modified `submit-emacs-patch` in my config. >>=20 >> I do wonder, since `(info "(emacs)Sending Patches")` recommends using >> `submit-emacs-patch` and that always seemed easier than doing `C-x m` >> and adding the destination address and the attachment patch afterwards, >> what alternative you'd expect experienced users to go with? > > Let's see what others think about this new command. > > Would people please voice their opinions about adding it? I was thinking of proposing such a patch myself sometime=E2=84=A2. I think= I would end up using the command more if I could turn off the help buffer. Though, I think the user option report-emacs-bug-no-explanations could be reused instead.