From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: missing font vs. illegal char
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:34:07 +0800
Message-ID: <8764lgcbr4.fsf@jidanni.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144773582 15597 80.91.229.2 (11 Apr 2006 16:39:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 16:39:42 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: handa@etl.go.jp
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 11 18:39:39 2006
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTLtn-000611-Ns
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 18:39:27 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTLtn-0003ij-C5
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:39:27 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTLth-0003fx-SI
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:39:21 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FTLth-0003fM-5P
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:39:21 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTLth-0003fI-1I
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:39:21 -0400
Original-Received: from [204.74.68.40] (helo=frodo.hserus.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FTLyZ-0006T9-QZ
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 12:44:23 -0400
Original-Received: from tc218-187-21-77.dialup.dynamic.apol.com.tw
	([218.187.21.77]:2561 helo=jidanni1)
	by frodo.hserus.net with esmtpsa 
	(Cipher TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.61 #1)
	id 1FTLta-0009He-0P by authid <jidanni> with plain;
	Tue, 11 Apr 2006 22:09:15 +0530
Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:15034
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/15034>

$ { echo '-*-coding: utf-8-unix;-*-';
 wget -O - http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/examples/UTF-8-test.txt;} > h.html
$ emacs h.html

I see the same rectangles for illegal characters that I do for missing
fonts in view-hello-file.

So emacs (21.4.1) doesn't distinguish the two cases. What would be
best is like firefox with the rectangles with the hex digits for
missing fonts... and diamonds with "?" for illegal chars.