From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9353: 24.0.50; default grep file name face is uglier now Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:04:24 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <8762lnrxyl.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314176742 26867 80.91.229.12 (24 Aug 2011 09:05:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9353@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 24 11:05:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw9Ox-0002Qs-2f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:05:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42977 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw9Ow-0003IK-Gs for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:05:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46633) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw9Ou-0003Hi-1o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:05:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw9Os-0005X7-NV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:05:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw9Os-0005Ww-M1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:05:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw9RK-0004H6-NB; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9353 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9353-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9353.131417686816406 (code B ref 9353); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9353) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2011 09:07:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw9R3-0004GS-2k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from smarty.dreamhost.com ([208.113.175.8]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qw9R0-0004GI-4V for 9353@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:07:43 -0400 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhostps.com (ps18281.dreamhost.com [69.163.218.105]) by smarty.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE806E807D; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 02:05:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AA5451C3A9; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 02:05:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:24:14 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:08:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:50270 Archived-At: > I don't know what's the connection either. Maybe it's a "match success". Yes, in the context of compilation messages, it means a "successful match". > The default font I use is readable in bold, because giving up on such > a useful tool would be too bad (remember that I prefer to use the same > color everywhere and distinguish things based on bold/italics/font), but > that's just me. IIUC, the only Drew's objection is the face's color, not boldness, because he uses a dim background. So we could change the color to a darker green, that will also look better on the default light background.