From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8615: Please make sure v q removes the buffer for JPGs just like it does for other files Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:13:15 +0800 Message-ID: <8762ia59qc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y5v9klwb.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87zkfo1zke.fsf@jidanni.org> <87fwhg9lbo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87y5v7gy4p.fsf@gnu.org> <874nxvmif0.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322115224 2672 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2011 06:13:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:13:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 8615@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 24 07:13:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTSYz-0007xk-1I for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 07:13:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60702 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTSYy-0000pE-Ib for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:13:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTSYv-0000ot-OX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:13:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTSYu-0000Ru-Mr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:13:33 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTSYu-0000Rq-LQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:13:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTSaL-0003m8-UG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:15:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:15:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8615 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 8615-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8615.132211529714487 (code B ref 8615); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 06:15:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8615) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Nov 2011 06:14:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTSaG-0003lZ-Od for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:14:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RTSaD-0003lS-Rr for 8615@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:14:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [155.69.16.137] (port=57112 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RTSYk-0004Ag-Rp; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:13:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874nxvmif0.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:20:23 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 01:15:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54253 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: > I mean keybindings > > RET image-toggle-animation > SPC image-scroll-up > DEL image-scroll-down > > vs > > RET View-scroll-line-forward > SPC View-scroll-page-forward > DEL View-scroll-page-backward Hmm, SPC and DEL seem to do pretty much the same thing in both cases, but the difference for RET is clearly problematic. So I think you're right, we should revert 105285. The original behavior requested by the OP (making `q' delete the buffer) can be handled, as discussed, by introducing an option to make quit-window delete the buffer---but that bit can wait till post-24.1.