From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9243: 24.0.50; Gnus keeps seeing 101 unread spam Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:35:01 +0100 Message-ID: <8762fzfja2.fsf@gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327534546 26949 80.91.229.12 (25 Jan 2012 23:35:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9243@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 00:35:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqCNP-0004gr-9N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:35:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56628 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqCNO-00048W-Q5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:35:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqCNL-00048G-5f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:35:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqCNJ-0004bG-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:35:35 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqCNJ-0004bC-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:35:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqCNl-0003Km-RT; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:36:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9243 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9243-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9243.132753454412790 (code B ref 9243); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9243) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jan 2012 23:35:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44139 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqCNT-0003KE-Gy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:35:44 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:41453) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqCNQ-0003K5-1w for 9243@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:35:41 -0500 Original-Received: from 93-41-173-241.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.173.241] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RqCMr-0003qL-4Q; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 00:35:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:56:53 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1RqCMr-0003qL-4Q MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1328139305.42206@D5CiwNiql33odY6UZZ9k4Q X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56014 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > After (setq nnimap-expunge nil), the expiry that happens when I leave > a group still takes a good while (I didn't notice any serious > difference), but moving email from one IMAP folder to another with "B m" > is *much* faster. That's kinda odd. They should either both be faster, or none, I'd have thought. Could you post the commands output into "*imap log*" upon group exit? Perhaps Gnus is sending way too many commands on exit or something... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome