From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12854: 24.2.50; `display-buffer-alist': conditions are not handled as documented Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:00:54 +0100 Message-ID: <876253u3ll.fsf@web.de> References: <87a9upp8qb.fsf@web.de> <50A65CA3.5070701@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353200478 20959 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2012 01:01:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 01:01:18 +0000 (UTC) To: 12854@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 18 02:01:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtGI-00081F-C9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:01:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34109 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtG8-0006of-2r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:01:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtG3-0006mF-By for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtG0-0000WS-9n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:01:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41370) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtG0-0000WO-66 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:01:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtGs-0001kv-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 01:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12854 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12854-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12854.13532004786696 (code B ref 12854); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 01:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12854) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Nov 2012 01:01:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51621 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtG8-0001jv-H9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:01:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:60640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TZtG5-0001jn-JS for 12854@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:01:15 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([82.113.121.80]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MZUnl-1TqkF325DZ-00LPdD; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 02:00:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50A65CA3.5070701@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:32:51 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:lnZIlsyDwwQtjPWzM5eNmti6FLUpu8MRMf2WRjEbmmW +2R0kHqSbSx2IjAgBqP61tGaMY4WFKQ+nU4oz30jIQ1+OtUC22 IXpiqg2ms4yudiiUq8Idk61vUE/ITRP1T/RIS6rBTucWT7zKDO vg82hgGi79mYrwnmxXPGVldHVLA5i3PM9VBLo68Z0iBN1Wm937 cR1xRzRShS0mNT8wXhoTQjT86ZQCJS7qstYRXjBjj0= X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:67090 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > > (1) If CONDITION is a function, it currently must be a symbol. I don't > > see why lambda expressions should be forbidden. The user should not > > need to use defun only to be able specify an argument. > > I lifted this restriction in revision 110885 on the Emacs-24 release > branch. Ok, thanks. My stuff works now as it's supposed to. > > (2) If CONDITION is a function, it takes _two_ arguments: a buffer > > _name_ (not a buffer) _and_ an alist. That should be clarified in the > > docstring. > > As a matter of fact, the code called that function with the variable > `display-buffer-alist' as second argument which doesn't make any sense. > I now pass it the ACTION argument of `display-buffer' instead and tried > to document this in the same revision as above. Looks ok to me, the code as well as the doc. Thanks, Michael.