From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15961: 24.3.50; display-buffer-at-bottom not at bottom Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:55:48 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <8761rdjqtj.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87bo1a3cxo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <5291D0B0.6020109@gmx.at> <529238DC.2030305@gmx.at> <5292FC0E.4050907@gmx.at> <52937DD9.8080801@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385601676 30775 80.91.229.3 (28 Nov 2013 01:21:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15961-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 28 02:21:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqIB-0007tQ-Fa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:21:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqIA-00068B-T0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:21:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqI1-00067Q-Ke for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:21:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqHu-0005YL-OO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:21:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34169) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqHu-0005YA-LN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqHu-0002y8-Fd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:21:02 -0500 Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 15961 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 15961@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, juri@jurta.org Original-Received: via spool by 15961-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D15961.138560163311350 (code D ref 15961); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15961-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2013 01:20:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48186 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqHQ-0002x0-RG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:20:33 -0500 Original-Received: from ps18281.dreamhost.com ([69.163.218.105]:39716 helo=ps18281.dreamhostps.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VlqHM-0002wl-R0 for 15961-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:20:31 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost.jurta.org (ps18281.dreamhostps.com [69.163.218.105]) by ps18281.dreamhostps.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA6F258B9E936; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:20:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52937DD9.8080801@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:42:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81037 Archived-At: >> I think we're miscommunicating. I was pointing out that binding >> split-width-threshold in display-buffer-at-bottom is OK because it can >> still be overridden by the user. > > OK. Committed as revision 115229 on trunk. Thank you. I confirm that display-buffer-at-bottom works now exactly like its name suggests in all window configurations.