From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16676: 24.3.50; Repeated but random hang Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:23:50 -0800 Message-ID: <8761opvr61.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <8738jv68vr.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83txcbxtg7.fsf@gnu.org> <87r47ecsy7.fsf@building.gnus.org> <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391855175 26907 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 10:26:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16676@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 11:26:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WC574-0005IQ-Gz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:26:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46019 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC573-0004nv-MH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56v-0004n8-9K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56p-0002fi-7M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56p-0002fe-3p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56o-0001g0-VQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16676.13918551176357 (code B ref 16676); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 10:25:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC564-0001eQ-MP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:25:17 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:40586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC561-0001eH-GI for 16676@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:25:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WC55n-0000t1-CC; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:24:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <834n4axa58.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:48:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WC55n-0000t1-CC MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392459900.1105@0zcnDzwx3ZDwgZWbYPy+Zg X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84929 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Xlib obviously thinks otherwise, the error message in the backtrace is > very clear. Well, might not something have scribbled something somewhere to make X believe the window is no longer viable? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/