From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16350: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:51:01 -0800 Message-ID: <8761onfwwq.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <83ob3qtikx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392004393 12287 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 03:53:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 16350@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 04:53:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WChvs-00035V-8Q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:53:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WChvr-0003FJ-Tk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:53:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44176) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WChvi-0003Eu-Fg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:53:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WChva-0003sG-Kw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:53:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WChva-0003sC-HC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:53:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WChva-0008Ot-60 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:53:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16350 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16350-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16350.139200435232235 (code B ref 16350); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 03:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16350) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2014 03:52:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33257 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WChv5-0008Nr-TE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:52:32 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56727) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WChv4-0008Nf-GL for 16350@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:52:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WChup-0005RM-99; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 04:52:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83ob3qtikx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 05 Jan 2014 20:00:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WChup-0005RM-99 MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392609136.26073@skVagKXU/62q+Bfojwt+fQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:85166 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Juanma Barranquero >> Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 18:29:10 +0100 >> Cc: 16350@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> next_interval at intervals.c:720 > > This is here: > > if (! NULL_RIGHT_CHILD (i)) > { > i = i->right; > while (! NULL_LEFT_CHILD (i)) <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > i = i->left; > > Which means we enter this fragment with 'i' that is non-NULL, but an > invalid pointer. > > I don't see how to catch this except on a debugger. Ok; closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/