From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daimrod Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18023: 24.3.92; [PATH] Missing fallback in latin-postfix input method Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 11:26:54 +0900 Message-ID: <8761ikn9ch.fsf@tanger.home> References: <874myjnjek.fsf@tanger.home> <83bnsi4kw8.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha2a8cet.fsf@tanger.home> <83a9823vhr.fsf@gnu.org> <874mya80u2.fsf@tanger.home> <83fvhpkgbh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406341704 15914 80.91.229.3 (26 Jul 2014 02:28:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 02:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18023@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 26 04:28:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XAria-0001ri-G4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2014 04:28:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57528 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAria-0001Bq-2E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:28:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAriS-0001Au-54 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAriM-0001BL-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XAriM-0001BG-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XAriM-0001Hz-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daimrod Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 02:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18023 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18023-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18023.14063416284893 (code B ref 18023); Sat, 26 Jul 2014 02:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18023) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2014 02:27:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XArhT-0001Gq-OR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:39572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XArhQ-0001GJ-I0 for 18023@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f176.google.com with SMTP id y10so6595033pdj.21 for <18023@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:26:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=u/JBxgTWRwQ3JpNDCRJy4Ifht19kjoA3owInnWZL0qk=; b=CFCHsSdL8H1hObvbvZiVxr/FEII7KLpHaLb3rjYyWcu8PKKwDpyrVntxA/pOJc2D/J wD46mK0b7SLdCb1W6qwTCmJo8vGFBTJz3W8ZcpWrY64Hx9g9BhgRox+SObK/OTIpIaMH QtQ6VGn6csD1go8jd5rLbEm7Awt84sdNfhEOZBqTSJo0nPdchAjRot2OxPCYFxJl5t2A P501oHXOnYFmJSYMZHPPsnSjo4nVS6JgvqvfxNjfgZEU39qtslY3e+ImKfCeE9whP8TN afwWBlrDXJKJgWI0o2hQRhQFHODfZrO7aGxK6lYCgtR+rf8Kdm2SHZx7DWxNabN9ASZ7 XADg== X-Received: by 10.66.251.200 with SMTP id zm8mr22567228pac.97.1406341618651; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (i118-21-141-133.s30.a048.ap.plala.or.jp. [118.21.141.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ue3sm10241375pbc.49.2014.07.25.19.26.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:26:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83fvhpkgbh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 25 Jul 2014 11:12:18 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91808 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Daimrod >> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 18023@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 13:38:29 +0900 >> >> >> > FWIW, it strikes me that "C-q _" is less typing. >> >> >> >> It's not consistent and it doesn't really save typing: >> >> - "SPC _ _" >> >> - "SPC C-q _" >> > >> > I meant "SPC SPC DEL _". As for "SPC _ _", it's of the same length, >> > so it doesn't save typing, either. >> >> It wasn't clear in my initial message so it's my fault. In my patch, I >> update the latin-postfix input-method so that one can type "SPC _ _" >> instead of "SPC SPC DEL _". >> >> Though I agree that it doesn't save typing compared to the method you >> proposed, my approach saves typing compared to the current method and I >> find my method faster to type because it's consistent with the other >> combinations and it doesn't "break the flow". > > I don't necessarily object to the change, I just wanted to point out > that alternatives better than "SPC SPC DEL _" do exist. If everybody agrees, can it be merged? My assignment number is #793656 though I don't think it is required for such a tiny change. Best, -- Daimrod/Greg