Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Which is obviously insufficient. I've since changed it to: >> >> "\\([A-Z][[:ascii:]-]+: \\)" >> >> Which works better, but also seems susceptible to breakage due to >> ignorance. A quick scan doesn't turn up any `mail-header-regexp' >> variables or `this-is-a-mail-header-p' functions -- does the above >> regexp seem reasonable? > > Headers are case insensitive... but not all characters in the [:ascii:] > set are allowed; far from it. [:alnum:] is closer, but with - and... > er... stuff... One of the RFCs probably has the definition. :-) Oh, good point. RFC2822 says chars 33 to 126, inclusive, minus the colon. So I guess it's "[!-9,;-~]+: ", unlikely as some of those characters seem. Now I'm working with the attached diff. Eric