From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36828: 27.0.50; Uninstalled emacs shows installed documentation Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:47:49 +0200 Message-ID: <875znkrj6y.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87lfwitcyf.fsf@telefonica.net> <83blxekwhz.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef2ataoj.fsf@telefonica.net> <837e82kssb.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7cxu16y.fsf@telefonica.net> <87h875qbrv.fsf@gmail.com> <83r268kiss.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="131789"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.1 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 36828@debbugs.gnu.org, ofv@wanadoo.es To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 29 16:48:17 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6wj-000YAU-M8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:48:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52778 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6wi-0006K4-9X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:48:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6wV-0006Jw-8y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6wU-0004tI-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40103) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6wU-0004t2-30 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6wT-0004Ji-Vb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36828 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36828-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36828.156441167916585 (code B ref 36828); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 14:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2019 14:47:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48924 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6wQ-0004JR-Rq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:47:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:38913) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hs6wO-0004JE-H7 for 36828@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:47:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id u25so43372016wmc.4 for <36828@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:47:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ev2/ctzKTUTsgiQSvkqZT8uxoRpXnDcMVfNdJCyJq5g=; b=KIU2uyTw07WPMu1zk0whmqn/H3ZI3NsQPdqZg0cxylVwTALojUtX9n18IBlmEm69uR rqhcPJtP7EL0TvqaIHBKIxSSYC08gyR+qOBAFcalAo+FnlCp1qAXqGWGO4kIWCL9AhCt N6oYRFDlnV1XX/5L3kUHlbM+sd22b+BOxf1vyITqqcikIjh69QnsGv3uyEIqxFI1rb2R VX0M0/h/l6y9wYZlgeiZLQpAnf//VpTRwIWSf3USKnf9bcPFYrGEx6coTkL8+yDOUaAA DMwrt+pIRdPAhuQDwxr2YJVqkkpYZKp41oC4O81eyZ47Y2b5FzDhicoz+OiX3c5m7DNn TegQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ev2/ctzKTUTsgiQSvkqZT8uxoRpXnDcMVfNdJCyJq5g=; b=uIwkKQXP8DDDbMd6RoxxNfcsoxGisvc/x+lBfR6wCoY8gtLXr+fCx1tOvzb+mxthXZ 5o/DaPWUgPYHoJEWugPObuyc4DdWKnoJV2TaNnYYLHNRjnRKYz1sOk4vvc7cP2nSOVfk 71JtwidTI0bEEaedLWtyLfTi0kPqOzzjvBYhgRyGONCi9jY+rPsJzvPqbv9rsNsDqyDW JV4JtAJBLjIkxeNValWe6Rxsmk3F+8NkyyIsThUKu3I8QgFsGRvzfnJSWafc+ZbiWRK1 SjZm0VSHZqAtV7gNpM1jBkKcWfMPWLEGIb84RviEuK9VQOl+S50GRbQYDkwdf+TQpFx9 V9QA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUeMsOoFxmLvB2cBRghOpUA4CP6Y2tbUBuJE/QnKp0TwPVmgICH VpdynmXE1mWF+YMKPDF4O8A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzgBORYDXFdgUQAVAVz1aZMr1inrZu6T1TnmHcJzHSmoOfolq0joqXfueXwkIx0c4093uizGQ== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c8c3:: with SMTP id f3mr36123176wml.124.1564411670609; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([185.112.167.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t13sm74601045wrr.0.2019.07.29.07.47.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 07:47:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r268kiss.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:164043 Archived-At: On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:38:11 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> FWIW, it find your use case totally legit and not unusual at all. > > "Unusual" doesn't mean it isn't legitimate, it just means it's > infrequent. I'm sorry, I should have thought better about the wording. I didn't mean to imply you didn't consider the use case legitimate. >> I can understand if nobody feels like attempting a fix right now > > By saying "fix" you imply this is a bug. But that's not necessarily > so, because it is also legitimate to want Emacs behave like it does > now, i.e. prefer the installed version to the one in the source tree. > Any fix will have to deal with the dichotomy, and let users request > the non-default variant. Indeed I do consider this a bug, and quite explicitely so. That emacs should always default to using the data most relevant for the running executable seems obvious to me. What am I missing? --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n