From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7513: 24.0.50; shell-command-default-error-buffer should always append to the bottom Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:12:01 +0200 Message-ID: <875zmocnce.fsf@gnus.org> References: <8739qls36x.fsf@jidanni.org> <877e76w4wf.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <83a7c1cmzs.fsf@gnu.org> <87mug0buvk.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <83pnkwbbt9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="227443"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rfrancoise@debian.org, 7513@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 23 10:13:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i14h5-000x2W-7p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:13:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52752 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i14h4-0004qo-6d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 04:13:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41270) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i14gx-0004qf-Hh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 04:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i14gw-0002eY-F5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 04:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i14gw-0002eU-C4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 04:13:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i14gw-0007zX-3Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 04:13:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7513 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 7513-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7513.156654792830639 (code B ref 7513); Fri, 23 Aug 2019 08:13:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7513) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2019 08:12:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39102 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i14g3-0007y7-PN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 04:12:07 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:42644) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i14g2-0007xx-48 for 7513@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 04:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i14fx-0005I1-OW; Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:12:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83pnkwbbt9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:06:26 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165672 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > So all you need to do is move point to EOB before adding the next > error? If so, that's fine with me, and probably something that was > just missed, assuming point will never move from there anyway. It doesn't seem like an oversight -- there's code to restore point (approximately) after inserting, so I think it's more of a misfeature of a kind. But I've now made it put the output at the end of the buffer, because that's way more logical. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no