From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#26996: 25.1; doc-view-revert-buffer doesn't detect file change while using tramp Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 15:56:21 +0100 Message-ID: <875zk2fht6.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87sgofl0me.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="234375"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Iakov Davydov , 26996@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 02 15:57:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQuq3-000yqR-1b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 15:57:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48252 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQuq1-0003KH-1f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:57:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iQupr-0003K6-F3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQupq-0002tQ-9R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iQupq-0002sO-65 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQupq-0008Iv-3O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 26996 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 26996-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B26996.157270658831872 (code B ref 26996); Sat, 02 Nov 2019 14:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 26996) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2019 14:56:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32832 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQupI-0008Hz-3F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:56:28 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:56240) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iQupG-0008Hq-6q for 26996@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 10:56:26 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iQupB-0003cq-Mz; Sat, 02 Nov 2019 15:56:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 01 Nov 2019 16:07:15 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170809 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Hmm... but now auto-revert loops forever: > updating the file -> triggers auto-revert -> your new code > saves the buffer to the file -> triggers auto-revert -> ... > > I think the patch below is needed. Sounds good; please > But I wonder why you added: > > (doc-view-make-safe-dir doc-view-cache-directory) > > did it just seemed safer or have you found a concrete case that > needed it? It been so long I barely remember. I mean, the patch is more than a month old. :-) Let's see... Yes, I think I remember the directory having been removed while I was playing with this stuff, so I had to make sure it existed before writing to it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no