From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47431: Process Whois connection broken by remote peer. Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:39:09 +0200 Message-ID: <875z17mohu.fsf@gnus.org> References: <835z1dp0qg.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2e9nhne.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgynp9t5.fsf@gnus.org> <406246af7fb57420287b@heytings.org> <87ft0ens4h.fsf@gnus.org> <87v998n5cu.fsf@gnus.org> <6820a941ae3e4668959e@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25645"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 47431@debbugs.gnu.org, hongyi.zhao@gmail.com To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 31 15:40:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRb4s-0006XJ-5C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:40:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49584 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRb4r-0004Y4-3Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRb4k-0004Xj-Sn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lRb4k-0001fc-Kr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRb4k-000384-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47431 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 47431-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47431.161719796111957 (code B ref 47431); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 47431) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2021 13:39:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53867 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRb45-00036n-9v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:39:21 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:60216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lRb43-00036a-Sf for 47431@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:39:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+4qcmEumccupU2lNGN5W3QJEFSAO8uo9Ojm8oHR3TBY=; b=AN+SOSu50j3bksWKV5tadBckd7 1O+01jVEqoIsK3FDz71tkNz8hpS2edBQBvvXq2ylAbqOVnoSzzrAZLK9Y6IMCnxKjHDk2FWQfYK72 TzmJQdQGk0QAKLCKi1njOXTdnC+MJ2SV1QOoGFC+Z0ROzZBwjpj3QoextYd3PoEj0Zmo=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lRb3u-0003cS-JZ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 15:39:13 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEVTKi2kKjm6QkzJ jJb///9f8wvTAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UDHw0iHpDi9ZgAAAG6SURBVDjLbZTtucMg CIWJWUDMAgoLpLL/bveAkrb3aX6kxpePI0KJ8mFmoiY9v+t7vxKLjjeAIR3sgJua3m9LXm8+sD9V NmhuGg7MaiacoUQG76f5fv0Bps3xC1wdagcf/8EQKioqIcbBHJ6/iciFHOZ2FfIdyAIvM2QJAJUA 4kBEAeCyQ9cNPFKCIADi3v79ujyWLOSqZIPJ8JjbBUCncACpZOngyT+eWh6PbzBI12IBbq5pBGiS sQivtYdLqVQkXQDCfhe1fHjE4fKmP8A6Q/0GHioiPaC9QSwzxSN+n2NsjwJ9nMXaZ077EVqEv4Av MonsUEGO0JnVab7q4dEQp2YveXO2uWQxHY0/gdmQlp18JBBCKxs/J4HmBZDD7Lqz/1DUkaEA7uj9 U8o8ogG8iFwRyfpBp00qVnpL4FNhN3XBKCnZjeZYoAnmqHugG0o0hod32c2gSRGmyPTWWslxPDVP PUs3hdEcW5VOna7/Ll3d+7Wami+d5lN/evJOu62Q4zKZfuyze32ZnpK0aTHznYo3A0XDYKJaw34U xPCDP4E1OH4JuuoXobiuzHE7T10BtD8gpud52kjwB71NYRuukxQhAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0 ZQAyMDIxLTAzLTMxVDEzOjM0OjI5KzAwOjAwImFH4wAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMS0w My0zMVQxMzozNDoyOSswMDowMFM8/18AAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Depeche Mode's _Speak & Spell_: "Puppets" In-Reply-To: <6820a941ae3e4668959e@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Wed, 31 Mar 2021 07:53:38 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:203362 Archived-At: Gregory Heytings writes: >> We accept that users will query whois.iana.org port 43 for ad-hoc, >> infrequent, and low volume queries (e.g. queries resulting from a >> user-driven web form, upon receipt of an email, and given a small >> list of domains). >> >> It reads like your client will be primarily user-driven and so we're >> fine with your approach. Note, the Mac OSX whois client first >> queries whois.iana.org and follows the referral, so there is >> precedent. > > So from a technical point of view, the solution is okay. What remains > is the potential privacy problem, but I think it's possible to avoid > it without using a cache. I don't think there's an expectation of privacy here -- the user knows that doing a whois query will result in server(s) being queried. So I think whois.el should be rewritten to do the two step query (and be asynchronous, which should be pretty trivial). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no