From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48404: 28.0.50; "Invalid version syntax" errors with read-extended-command Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:31:43 +0200 Message-ID: <875yzggocg.fsf@gnus.org> References: <875yzms6im.fsf@gnu.org> <83wns1zvhs.fsf@gnu.org> <871ra9kdgs.fsf@gnu.org> <83czttzstr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wns1n4k6.fsf@gnus.org> <835yzlzr37.fsf@gnu.org> <87cztqojsk.fsf@gnus.org> <835yzivjnc.fsf@gnu.org> <87cztqn3p9.fsf@gnus.org> <834kf2viof.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7j1lb30.fsf@gnus.org> <83eee5tpr3.fsf@gnu.org> <87tun1jvbq.fsf@gnus.org> <838s4dtozq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17926"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 48404@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, tsdh@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 18 15:33:55 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lizr8-0004Vc-C5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:33:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35764 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lizr7-0007Ia-Ac for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lizpK-0004dF-5U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:32:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43139) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lizpJ-0000sx-TD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:32:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lizpJ-0000jW-MZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:32:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48404 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 48404-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48404.16213447172616 (code B ref 48404); Tue, 18 May 2021 13:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48404) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 May 2021 13:31:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54685 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lizpE-0000fw-PV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:31:57 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:41892) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lizpC-0000aV-D9 for 48404@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:31:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kAZzgZm0G8Gf3zxUgP5rSNOTZwbZrLJVFp+hyZf9/Bo=; b=dZuhO4H+u1gnMJ0KMVsjoTey4V 2mbm2yxMq+dYie5QBW0Qp7KZVub7FRyhmKIbktn252aZcIbCfsvOB7kEKII68rIoUCpCFPUC6efmm SCbBO8IBFetg1bvXwjNugYkkVBahKOevBheW+Rak1p4rDFO9XKYOdaD7UYTRlAKyJZNo=; Original-Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lizp2-0005ZL-Df; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:31:47 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAFVBMVEX+/vzlzZ6/lWz7 98+XbEs2Lif///9n/utRAAAAAWJLR0QGYWa4fQAAAAd0SU1FB+UFEg0PE7NT/rcAAAGpSURBVDjL ddRLdusgDABQJ7TzAO68UsncDukCqoj5ey3sfyuVIORLPXAc3YMEipxpul7OrzHG6ekyEOMQNju5 XeFr6U+Huiz27+W7g32A0gHq/ZKrlPe/4N/5iWAyfok9V7kUOdnFSPwKvQjhYuJ0OYnArp1PYIO7 W2hFjJfI/Yr/DXbnXfVtuVTOsNyDUI2Y9yc4N/e02qXC8gR+GsH0tcYx0AE/hsAr+CGEKMXlmE/w qSdcB/BykrgdpNqytdYPYMOEQ9gygR+NVuC24BGOzNhm8T6XY2Yq5B9gdUEgp5LhNpd1YEOoUEq2 lyVbQrkCJ1YohTrNEoZag0u7oGUTADvfQmHfAGwtjpS61Mn5RGu1BiHtO2SFV5A4EkvGuQZTbnO7 Bd0Vkm4hl5Q5/TQwkqcSAuTC3ylJyjpjR5Y1TtfBnIn2bN8aHAIgoEOy6DjvCVNQMHElhxJDuVnC ULdVIWpZmLWQlR/LhgbSzVkhBDkIEEinzFzqCxOP2kZpSajgo9EebuIVWE8jo7Iq6D/OAZAFpFvy KUOk74OOXnRLYO2iJMvyy0uy6RfLPnvmOhjsugAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAyMS0wNS0x OFQxMzoxNToxOCswMDowMCmsDEEAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMDUtMThUMTM6MTU6 MTgrMDA6MDBY8bT9AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Zola Jesus's _Taiga_: "Nail" In-Reply-To: <838s4dtozq.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 17 May 2021 17:27:05 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206777 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> They don't really need to. They decide "we think people with Emacs 25 >> shouldn't have this in their M-x TAX" and then put "26.1;Magit/1.2" in >> the string. > > We need to talk to them to get their agreement, I think. We cannot > decide for them that this is what they should do. I think we just have to establish a convention that external packages could use. Whether they then want to use it is up to them. That is, if they don't want to, then Emacs' behaviour with regards to obsoleted commands won't change -- but if they want to see this new behaviour, they'll need to reformat their obsoletion strings. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no