From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#50256: thing-at-mouse Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:59:59 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <875yvknpls.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <87sfys6ubm.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87eeacdnmg.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7f7z8ui.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871r6a8ooe.fsf@gnus.org> <87y28i85xi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87k0k1o5ks.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ilzk6bsr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <6dcf3191-dbb3-0c6c-2483-0fc05e9ff6e5@gmx.at> <83lf4gqyn9.fsf@gnu.org> <1a65f234-c1ee-ae95-aa05-2e3d9d1e1002@gmx.at> <8335qoqobm.fsf@gnu.org> <7c9cb0a1-b222-cb06-7e7c-7f17231faca3@gmx.at> <83pmtsp4g1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5468"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 50256@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 01 20:01:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLUYJ-0001G8-7h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:01:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41152 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLUYI-0006rt-87 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:01:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58048) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLUXm-0006aZ-T9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLUXm-0004KN-Cg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLUXm-0006Y7-7s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 18:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50256 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 50256-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50256.163051923025124 (code B ref 50256); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 18:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 50256) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 18:00:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38978 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLUXG-0006XA-Jj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:00:30 -0400 Original-Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:43229) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLUXD-0006Wu-SF for 50256@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:00:28 -0400 Original-Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay11.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 720D6100004; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:00:18 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83pmtsp4g1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 20:54:06 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:213218 Archived-At: >> I have only run `with-current-buffer'. The selected window shows >> *Messages*. > > Then what is the semantics of the code snippet above, and why did you > call with-current-buffer the second time? What did you want to > accomplish, except make a point? > > IOW, what kind of real-life situation needs such a code? In bug#9923 'C-h m' switched to another buffer before calling mouse-set-point.