From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52973: Adding a few context-menu-mode commands Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 19:01:46 +0000 Message-ID: <875yqu59wl.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87o84tp69h.fsf@posteo.net> <868rvwsezi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87czl75lyz.fsf@posteo.net> <86czl6au29.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874k6idjod.fsf@posteo.net> <86o84pthgp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87pmp4lmfz.fsf@posteo.net> <86pmp41vby.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czl47ghd.fsf@gnu.org> <86ee5kzjo2.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83bl0o6oei.fsf@gnu.org> <87iluwkkyn.fsf@posteo.net> <83k0fc54bd.fsf@gnu.org> <86bl0m13o1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83v8yu2hkq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19951"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 52973@debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 08 20:02:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n6Gyp-00050Y-1O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 20:02:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32960 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6Gyn-0002hS-Ct for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 14:02:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33864) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6GyY-0002cQ-7k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 14:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n6GyX-0002ah-Tb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 14:02:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6GyX-0002Up-RX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 14:02:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Philip Kaludercic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 19:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52973 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 52973-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52973.16416685169580 (code B ref 52973); Sat, 08 Jan 2022 19:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52973) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2022 19:01:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48709 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6GyR-0002US-Tq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 14:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:44195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1n6GyQ-0002UE-Fm for 52973@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jan 2022 14:01:55 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83028240103 for <52973@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 8 Jan 2022 20:01:48 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1641668508; bh=bwiv0I7ca/5NgMQ55p5dwY073FImnuhziclQ9BwpBmc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=KjSX215iTjJlivMqmJ2dXoR/78Lp1q0YqspYbybrx83vBV6J8BtEGZ0z3ccabr28U EwP/5o/V6OvjYq5+NdSRpXQPwgNcZ2TnLHOfK1wETL/tae/kDGToql4IUuLI5ZoX6w 8bnYcysn/n4T7so/9JIdBp4vNyoG28dYtcRUEyRKes75sx90Q7GXnQKdcyJ0OS0jBk 0lNTobc7KXH/+qqWnNTegf2h+/sLPCXy3JXqFJQ71lnFJsYHzXU9KdZmk6N6RtyPXN JtMB4tdjmySAjK7BinCZY7dwELD1c84efkR2M24izP/O5nJE/q8jROq4hilIydnRyC 8wrGhj2bmlv/w== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4JWTwC44ZTz6tq8; Sat, 8 Jan 2022 20:01:47 +0100 (CET) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: <83v8yu2hkq.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 08 Jan 2022 20:44:21 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:223821 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Juri Linkov >> Cc: Philip Kaludercic , larsi@gnus.org, >> 52973@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 20:30:06 +0200 >> >> None of the proposed functions is specific to a mode. > > The way I see it, the functions in man.el are for Man-mode, and those > in hi-lock.el are for hi-lock-mode. No, the Man functions can be used anywhere you want to read a man page. It checks if the user clicked on something like "emacs(1)", then inserts a entry into the context menu to open the man page at point. The hi-lock functions can be used to highlight a symbol, just like with `M-s h .'. Requiring hi-lock-mode to be enabled beforehand would be counterproductive. >> When the global value of context-menu-functions >> contains one of the proposed functions, right-clicking anywhere >> will autoload every package where such context functions are defined. > > This is over-engineered, IMO. There should be no need for such > complexity. What would you suggest to simplify this? -- Philip Kaludercic