From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#56423: 29.0.50; Hi-lock in dired broken by toggling wdired-mode Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:04:22 +0200 Message-ID: <875yk795fd.fsf@web.de> References: <874jzui52r.fsf@web.de> <87iloa2hlm.fsf@web.de> <87mtdmyrp4.fsf@web.de> <83o7y15vtz.fsf@gnu.org> <87edyxz0as.fsf@web.de> <83czeh5hy9.fsf@gnu.org> <87bku15g5e.fsf@web.de> <835yk959w4.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfndufh3.fsf@web.de> <87o7y1uf03.fsf@web.de> <83y1x452r7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22617"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 56423@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 08 14:05:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1o9mjR-0005kC-9F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:05:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37494 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9mjQ-0006ON-1X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 08:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9mjG-0006Ls-Nn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 08:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36899) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o9mjG-0005gs-EL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 08:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9mjG-00087t-88 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 08:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 12:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 56423 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 56423-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B56423.165728187431169 (code B ref 56423); Fri, 08 Jul 2022 12:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 56423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jul 2022 12:04:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59029 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9min-00086f-QE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 08:04:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:52901) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1o9mik-00086D-2h for 56423@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 08:04:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1657281863; bh=HyjjEqqHjEZJDGD1uHajQ4K7t2iYJkJpVTzayS1z8pg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=A2YvG6iE/G1loT3L0C5NwwCkZ/jv8B9EAIp1T8ApiDnc0H65dSzyqjhLLiqmnf4Br VDfVbobLxPQ23fRijMRZtoJiS8pTRVE2YErxB+cOsSaB8OHsNR+m2GSDKrOwdWtQ3+ mI250BRz8uIRBQy8XxqvYZzp96LV6fwqu3U08Ag8= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([84.59.210.236]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb006 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MkVwo-1nizxR3aTm-00lyL2; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:04:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83y1x452r7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 07 Jul 2022 19:03:24 +0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ll5Rs6xkoEyOobb4P9SwjDiLcchaonwIbpgpfaVNkkBCXgbTF4F FGMbcwRF+XUVCKXVq5kpcWkeq/BJGFzCK/NDj7EhPzQ93yQYNcqe9PoHEY77opoNi3QLAUE LeqM07wPwVsgb5k7VIT+RcA2H3Wakn1lt8bO62Je1KFzxvQ4PrLYeFzT0psmLcGLT/NyriQ +xV6g45H1CLyCGbQGeSMw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:v2THaYproKk=:9y0h8tIoOUg+JPcRyyOdLd gahWTM9Gb8XAqXB52asSOTlAgcK14ZLtm+D8kmhHvRsIPAndnsfPwUvZ6FV85YTjVL00xYYoF PpkbPcs2o+PXMFllotGIewLmySRPhqCAjiRNbNfDy4vcQdNRiukKXzt34xnura4Qz82Pc5U8D i5HT5l7bMr1dPqOkECfZW8vC4XXeZQZhvrJTnmkz0gSbpsQj91aVHtIIKGn/8kCLPdosfCzzo x/1ng7Sg73uuakfTBHsGXq3KJJiXQq5STps4/1vyPSM8ItynXoLGBlcGuuy73h+3w05BVtqiH tTtC27bmijzForWLUtuhNQkfWgLhupU5ll+NVmimsCPW3wd4fLklpoPVl+aUwbJU+7rsJne0x PCLZzAJbHcdkFMWfyKaJomXTnX37MeU8vZm6IZebNgRU+xwMaOJJ0qHArymCSYhWM2uwF+Ejz xmKiD7BbdgfzM//Fs2CCmTYTMLLq+ccZTHER6SNu6+dMfzbLp1nnOzDq+elNyDg7PZshFDTzA hUa1h+PfPUktVInVcMbeF2DVKv9it27Eap1nx0T6stl6yfgdw2cdvxIX760umc/ohC4FYMZrs Ew1JU/tyoKzRMJBCHcehmov0Pc0ef2KoVLmiicTn05owlldWYHqXZz7XJeJOz18JW2ApvQdfo 1Fkz86ZD7yb7OS0DaYaDtPoADwE9CflNer2PdpkOt9viY5hub6q22OXYdGe46XGh3O9m43AXA Dxo//q/aH7Aq2EQu61MINbTn7GXP1Ts43uVuklI2UD6Wwn3jNvuk/8UrWxgJFjQJ0tqPh4DA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:236448 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Yes, it's okay to inhibit-quit for short intervals of time and around > small code fragments. The direction back (especially `wdired-finish-edit' after making many changes) is problematic however. If the user aborts when file changes have been performed partly we have a problem I think. Michael.