From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#64735: 29.0.92; find invocations are ~15x slower because of ignores Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:52:31 +0000 Message-ID: <875y6brrnk.fsf@localhost> References: <87r0p1cta3.fsf@gmx.de> <87pm4ll7ox.fsf@localhost> <87a5vpcmc7.fsf@gmx.de> <878rb9l1f5.fsf@localhost> <87zg3pb6yt.fsf@gmx.de> <83zg3p9s39.fsf@gnu.org> <878rb944wi.fsf@localhost> <83tttx9q4v.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm4lb4fr.fsf@gmx.de> <83pm4l9n0o.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzutb14l.fsf@gmx.de> <83mszp9kl2.fsf@gnu.org> <83h6pwa52z.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilaci637.fsf@catern.com> <83sf9g88eh.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm4krq2m.fsf@localhost> <838rb881ak.fsf@gnu.org> <87mszornlq.fsf@localhost> <83351g7yn5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35536"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: sbaugh@janestreet.com, rms@gnu.org, sbaugh@catern.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, michael.albinus@gmx.de, 64735@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 23 09:53:30 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qNTuE-00095d-B0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:53:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qNTtq-0001sO-HM; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 03:53:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qNTtm-0001pp-A8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 03:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qNTtm-0005eZ-24 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 03:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qNTtl-0002Kb-M6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 03:53:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64735 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 64735-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64735.16900987468909 (code B ref 64735); Sun, 23 Jul 2023 07:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 64735) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jul 2023 07:52:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37892 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qNTtB-0002Jd-V1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 03:52:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:57049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qNTtA-0002JL-CI for 64735@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 03:52:24 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB29A240101 for <64735@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:52:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1690098738; bh=z4aKAFp8VnAm2PusYShpVkSIeEv0GiQgMWrtBdHXfAA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=PDaBsbQtt0DjNttxIXAfhfljM0cRUMVDKUjMUOyyAx/d5qrulcIiQXFhV8vsEE7KJ L5HAwkIiRZ2eRC/9t7RYlzWtVIs3Ss6MW+GS0eOTRYJw3h5gKiO5Wt2KBlkkq1TN8Q raTmoPGNrnqVm9lK5PmUsRG8G/zq9tLfUHImynVodzR/Qt4NNfNVQR8fO83NYNXs5O QmfsEUWYCoZmFPw6f2uV60vgT5MyZrw20KQCJkwLeQezNglhzZVW4R6sqxXAtPWoer gKGrNiAHTZJYQFnt9EP3zoF0beMk4L8IOz5KqWDHPDYu6l3KFqfA4TZZJVPMzT1MCE SkLjMTFSsF5JQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4R7wVp1Hzyz6txs; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:52:18 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83351g7yn5.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:265869 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Then how will the callback be different from >> (mapc #'my-function (directory-files-recursively ...)) >> ? > > It depends on the application. Applications that want to get all the > data and only after that process it will not use the callback. But I > can certainly imagine an application that inserts the file names, or > some of their transforms, into a buffer, and from time to time > triggers redisplay to show the partial results. Or an application > could write the file names to some disk file or external consumer, or > send them to a network process. But won't the Elisp callback always result in a queue that will effectively be synchronous? Also, another idea could be using iterators - the applications can just request "next" file as needed, without waiting for the full file list. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at