unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org>
To: "João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
	64784@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#64784: 30.0.50; Eglot: Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p return) in eglot--post-self-insert-hook
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 09:21:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875y6bm5ut.fsf@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h6pw9tpa.fsf@gmail.com>

João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:

Hi João,

> Even before Stefan answers, 'last-command-event' sounds right to me.
> In latest master, I've replaced the previous hacky solution with a
> simplified one based on this 'last-command-event' and it doesn't need
> any translation and works correctly on both TTY and GUI Emacs.
>
> Tassilo, can you test?

I can say at least that the error is gone.  Thank you!

(The below isn't actually related to the bug but to the feature the code
is providing.)

And now I also looked what that code is actually doing: you do
eglot-format after some trigger characters which seem to be queried from
the LS.  In my case of rust-analyzer, that seems to be

  (:firstTriggerCharacter "=" :moreTriggerCharacter ["." ">" "{"])

eglot-format works good in that buffer and seems to do exactly what
rustfmt also does.  Here I have a problem with rust-ts-mode which seems
to have a sightly different idea about the indentation of some
constructs, e.g., eglot-format and rustfmt say this is "correct"

    fn is_prev_next_window_variant(&self) -> bool {
        matches!(
            self,
            SwayrCommand::NextWindow { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::PrevWindow { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::NextTiledWindow { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::PrevTiledWindow { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::NextTabbedOrStackedWindow { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::PrevTabbedOrStackedWindow { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::NextFloatingWindow { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::PrevFloatingWindow { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::NextWindowOfSameLayout { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::PrevWindowOfSameLayout { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::NextMatchingWindow { .. }
                | SwayrCommand::PrevMatchingWindow { .. }
        )
    }

while rust-ts-mode prefers this:

    fn is_prev_next_window_variant(&self) -> bool {
        matches!(
            self,
            SwayrCommand::NextWindow { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::PrevWindow { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::NextTiledWindow { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::PrevTiledWindow { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::NextTabbedOrStackedWindow { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::PrevTabbedOrStackedWindow { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::NextFloatingWindow { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::PrevFloatingWindow { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::NextWindowOfSameLayout { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::PrevWindowOfSameLayout { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::NextMatchingWindow { .. }
            | SwayrCommand::PrevMatchingWindow { .. }
        )
    }

I actually like the rust-ts-mode variant better but don't find a
(stable) knob in the rustfmt.config to make it agree.  Anyway, I have no
strong preference but frequently produce such needless whitespace
changes during editing (which, of course, cargo fmt will "repair").

So is there a way to stop the indentation wars?  Maybe if I could make
it so that return and tab would also be considered as trigger characters
for eglot-format?

Bye,
Tassilo





  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-23  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-22  5:06 bug#64784: 30.0.50; Eglot: Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p return) in eglot--post-self-insert-hook Tassilo Horn
2023-07-22  6:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-07-22  9:33   ` João Távora
2023-07-22 14:05     ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-07-23  7:21     ` Tassilo Horn [this message]
2023-07-23 10:20       ` bug#64784: LSP vs Emacs indentation [Was: bug#64784: 30.0.50; Eglot: Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p return) in eglot--post-self-insert-hook] João Távora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875y6bm5ut.fsf@fastmail.fm \
    --to=tsdh@gnu.org \
    --cc=64784@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=joaotavora@gmail.com \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).